Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2020 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2020 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] COVID-19 Question

Date: Mar 23, 2020 20:09 UTC

Author: Michael <mabuczynski**At_Symbol_Here**HOTMAIL.COM>

Next by Date

Subject: [DCHAS-L] Open Access Webinar: Meaningful and Concise Safety Summaries for ACS Publications

Date: Mar 23, 2020 20:28 UTC

Author: DCHAS Membership Chair <membership**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG>

Thread context

From: Mary Beth Koza <mbkoza2**At_Symbol_Here**GMAIL.COM>

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] COVID-19 Question

Date: Mar 23, 2020 20:13 UTC

Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety

In-Reply-To: Re: [DCHAS-L] COVID-19 Question

Demystify: 

Group,

Here is what our local hospital is accepting. They are accepting home sewn covers. Anyone who sews should start making them.

UNC is accepting donations of 100% cotton washable covers for N-95 masks. Information for sewing masks can be found at the link: https://www.unchealthcare.org/coronavirus/ways-to-help/. Look on the left side of the page under Homemade Face Masks. There's a helpful video too! UNC is using the pattern and information from the Deaconess Health System. There is also a pattern from freesewing.org.




Mary Beth Koza
Treasurer - Division of Chemical Health & Safety of the ACS



On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 3:41 PM NEAL LANGERMAN <neal**At_Symbol_Here**chemical-safety.com> wrote:
All
Yes, devices such as a HPV or EtO system will work. Unfortunately medical care facility administrators do not see a viable path that cannot be implemented immediately and easily. Thus they are telling staff to make do with what they have.
Among other options I have urged my MD son-in-law to protect his family by sleeping at the hospital. Assume he will be contagious and isolate from the family
Questions such as soaking in 91% IPA or 0.5% bleach have been raised. Administrators do not have answers.



Sent from Neal Langerman's NEXUS 6.
Standard client confidentiality terms apply.

On Mon, Mar 23, 2020, 11:03 Lawrence M Gibbs <lgibbs**At_Symbol_Here**stanford.edu> wrote:

Neal et al,

Keep in mind particulate filtering respirators were developed primarily for inert particulate matter (wood dust, silica, etc.). When used in a clinical setting, the particulate matter is no longer inert, but potentially can replicate and infect individuals upon exposure (uptake). For this reason, reuse of an N-95 is not typically recommended for use in biohazard protection, as a general rule.

Having said that we are entering that stage of an emergency where scarcity of the primary protective device is occurring. A number of academic clinical centers are running into the same issues and are doing some testing of methodologies for possible reuse of n-95 particle respirators. The attached is one such report on methodology for disinfection of the masks for possible reuse. Note that gas or vapor is needed to assure complete penetration of the filtrate substrate where infectious particulates may adhere. Work is currently being done by some of the regional academic bio research facilities on this and protocols being developed demonstrating the process and testing using indicator strips of the disinfection. I suggest caution on applying considerations for non-viable particulates to the current situation for N-95s or other respiratory protective equipment.

Larry

Lawrence M. Gibbs, CIH, FAIHA

Associate Vice Provost Emeritus

Stanford University

lgibbs**At_Symbol_Here**stanford.edu

(c) 650-387-1131