Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2020 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2020 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Ask Dr. Safety: Recovery and Contingency - A Virtual Symposium Wednesday Evening April 15th

Date: Apr 10, 2020 15:33 UTC

Author: pzavon**At_Symbol_Here**ROCHESTER.RR.COM

Next by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Ask Dr. Safety: Recovery and Contingency - A Virtual Symposium Wednesday Evening April 15th

Date: Apr 10, 2020 17:19 UTC

Author: Rob Toreki <info**At_Symbol_Here**ILPI.COM>

Thread context

From: NEAL LANGERMAN <neal**At_Symbol_Here**CHEMICAL-SAFETY.COM>

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Ask Dr. Safety: Recovery and Contingency - A Virtual Symposium Wednesday Evening April 15th

Date: Apr 10, 2020 17:03 UTC

Reply-To: neal**At_Symbol_Here**CHEMICAL-SAFETY.COM

In-Reply-To: Re: [DCHAS-L] Ask Dr. Safety: Recovery and Contingency - A Virtual Symposium Wednesday Evening April 15th

Demystify: 

The outline I presented is based on activity at a global pharma w/ about 1800 essential workers daily. While I am not enthralled with body temperature as a screening for COVID-19, the site wants to keep it. The questionnaire has been much more effective. They are seeing a denial of entry of 1-3 persons per week based on it. Some return after a day or two with medical clearance; some become symptomatic.

 

I much prefer this screening approach to none at all or to just temperature. It reassures the employees and clearly shows the company is proactive in protecting the employees, the facility and the product.

 

Join Harry Elston and me next Wednesday evening to begin a discussion of recovery from the pandemic shut-down and the contingencies we might anticipate.

 

Stay healthy and stay safe.

 

nl

 

 

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post