Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2020 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2020 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Ask Dr. Safety: Recovery and Contingency - A Virtual Symposium Wednesday Evening April 15th

Date: Apr 10, 2020 20:41 UTC

Author: Lisa Zeise <lisa**At_Symbol_Here**MEL-CO.COM>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Ask Dr. Safety: Recovery and Contingency - A Virtual Symposium Wednesday Evening April 15th

Date: Apr 10, 2020 21:51 UTC

Author: Monona Rossol <0000030664c37427-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU>

Thread context

From: NEAL LANGERMAN <neal**At_Symbol_Here**CHEMICAL-SAFETY.COM>

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Ask Dr. Safety: Recovery and Contingency - A Virtual Symposium Wednesday Evening April 15th

Date: Apr 10, 2020 20:53 UTC

Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety

In-Reply-To: Re: [DCHAS-L] Ask Dr. Safety: Recovery and Contingency - A Virtual Symposium Wednesday Evening April 15th

Demystify: 

I point out, with no criticism intended or implied that the relevant epidemiology parameter is tests per unit population not total tests. The USA is way behind by that measure.
Further clinicians can correctly diagnose COVID 19 w/o testing. Broad-based testing is needed for reliable evidence - based policy decisions.
Stay healthy and stay safe.
Neal

Sent from Neal Langerman's NEXUS 6.
Standard client confidentiality terms apply.

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020, 13:25 Zack Mansdorf <mansdorfz**At_Symbol_Here**bellsouth.net> wrote:

Monna:

First, we actually have tested more people than any other country in the world. Some of the testing in some countries (such as China) had poor reliability. Antibodies normally indicate that you are over the infection if you are walking around versus being treated and I am not aware of any test for "shedding". Tests for having the infection would not make sense if you have no symptoms (it is not practical to test 320 million people). Having a negative test on Tuesday, means you do not have the virus on Tuesday. Maybe you get it Wednesday.

Zack

From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU> On Behalf Of Monona Rossol
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2020 2:38 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Ask Dr. Safety: Recovery and Contingency - A Virtual Symposium Wednesday Evening April 15th

Gee, how about we test people? There are tests for shedding, tests for anitbodies (doesn't mean you still aren't shedding) and tests for just plain having the virus. We see a lot more testing in other countries. You can't fix what you can't track. Monona

-----Original Message-----
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU
Sent: Fri, Apr 10, 2020 11:33 am
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Ask Dr. Safety: Recovery and Contingency - A Virtual Symposium Wednesday Evening April 15th

While it is true that perhaps as much as 50% or those infected are asymptomatic, what else can be done as a screen in the absence of a readily available quick turn-around test for the virus or antibodies?

Temperature screening was more effective with SARS-1 since it looked like the asymptomatic were not infectious.

At least a temperature screen will identify _some_ of those infected. These days, the perfect cannot be the enemy of the "sort-of OK."

Peter Zavon, CIH
Penfield, NY

PZAVON**At_Symbol_Here**Rochester.rr.com

From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU> On Behalf Of Monona Rossol
Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2020 10:04 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Ask Dr. Safety: Recovery and Contingency - A Virtual Symposium Wednesday Evening April 15th