Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2021 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2021 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Registration for RAMP in the Research Lab workshop now available

Date: Sep 20, 2021 13:04 UTC

Author: CHAS membership <membership**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Glove permeation chart - not company

Date: Sep 20, 2021 15:14 UTC

Author: Monona Rossol <0000030664c37427-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU>

Thread context

From: Yaritza Brinker <YBrinker**At_Symbol_Here**FELE.COM>

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Glove permeation chart - not company

Date: Sep 20, 2021 13:45 UTC

Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety

In-Reply-To: Re: [DCHAS-L] Glove permeation chart - not company

Demystify: 

I addition to everyone's fantastic advice, I'd like to point out that the ACS Rubber Division's Los Angeles Rubber Group developed a chemical resistance chart for rubber materials. This chart can be useful when the subject chemical is not listed in the manufacturer's glove chart. At a bare minimum, it will give you an indication of potential issues with various glove types.

 

You can find the chart at their website https://tlargi.org/media/2019/01/TLARGI_Chemical_Resistance_Chart.pdf

 

Also, the chart is also available as a searchable database hosted by Dupont at https:​//mscrm-dupont.secure.force.com/CRG_TlargiGuide

 

Thank you,

 

Yaritza Brinker

260.827.5402

 

From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU> On Behalf Of Jessica Martin
Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2021 9:14 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Glove permeation chart - not company

 

** External Email **

Thank you to everyone who provided useful answers and resources on this thread. As always, it is interesting to see how seasoned professionals take on even the most basic of questions. Also, I always enjoy reading the historical perspectives that several members here bring to discussions like these. As you well know, newbies benefit far more from mentorship than a Google search.

 

Best,

Jessica A. Martin, Ph.D.

NSF Graduate Research Fellow (2018-2021)

Joint Safety Team, Founding Member (2018-2021)

Pinkhassik Group, Department of Chemistry (2016-2021)

University of Connecticut

323-327-3974

 

"To change a community, you have to change the composition of the soil�

If you want to meet with me, come to the garden with your shovel so we can plant some sh-t." 

Ron Finley

 

"Argue for your limitations 

and sure enough they're yours." 

Richard Bach

 

"You know, farming looks mighty easy

when your plow is a pencil, and you're

a thousand miles from the corn field."

Dwight Eisenhower

 

"Sometimes you just have to nod

like a lizard."

Monica Nyansa 



On Sep 17, 2021, at 8:37 PM, John Callen <jbcallen**At_Symbol_Here**GMAIL.COM> wrote:

 

 

*Message sent from a system outside of UConn.*

 

 

Monona,

 

The reason why I didn't include Kimberly-Clark and certain other manufacturers was based upon my chemistry experience from high school through research at 3M.

 

Although it dates me, during that period, from 1961 until 1976, the use of "disposable/single use" examination gloves was not only unthinkable but also forbidden.  I was acquainted only with and used the Ansell Solvex (nitrile), neoprene and natural latex rubber gloves with caliper thickness 15mil - 22mil for any and all work on the open lab bench, in a hood/cabinet or glove box.

 

I may be "old fashioned" but also I have at home a supply of those type of gloves for housework.  I do have a box of 4mil nitrile examination gloves but use them only for medical and personal hygiene reasons.  

 

Be Safe and Stay Healthy!

 

John

3M Personal Safety Division - Retired

ACS/DCHAS Founding Member

(312) 632-0195



On Sep 17, 2021, at 12:57, Monona Rossol <0000030664c37427-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU> wrote:

 

John, you can add to the wonderful list of manufacturers Kimberly Clark who makes the thin examining gloves that most chemistry students and their teachers that I see actually use.  And they do have a chart as I mentioned. But they also clearly say in their brochure that those gloves should be removed and replaced if a chemical even splashes on them.   Monona

-----Original Message-----
From: John Callen <jbcallen**At_Symbol_Here**GMAIL.COM>
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU
Sent: Fri, Sep 17, 2021 12:08 pm
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Glove permeation chart - not company

Jessica,

 

As per the replies to your request, the consensus is that you should work with the data as "manufacturer specific" and not "generic."

 

Here are two helpful information sheets from W. W. Grainger, Quick Tips #166 & #191 on chemical resistant gloves.

 

 

 

Also, you may want to speak to someone at the Technical Service Department of any one of the following manufacturers and Grainger for help.

 

  • Ansell
  • Grainger (distributor)
  • Magid Glove & Safety (manufacturer/distributor)
  • MAPA
  • North by Honeywell
  • SHOWA

 

Good Luck!

 

Be Safe and Stay Healthy!

 

All My Best,

 

John B. Callen, Ph.D.

3M Personal Safety Division - Retired

ACS/DCHAS Founding Member

(312) 632-0195

 

 

 

 



On Sep 17, 2021, at 10:26, Margaret Rakas <mrakas**At_Symbol_Here**SMITH.EDU> wrote:

 

you also have to take into account the glove thickness, which could vary by brand.  Some nitrile gloves are 4 mm, others 8 mm...

 

I don't think I would want a generic chart, so much depends on the mfg.  And they have quite a bit of incentive to get it right...$$$$$

 

My two cents...

 

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 7:44 AM Zack Mansdorf <mansdorfz**At_Symbol_Here**bellsouth.net> wrote:

Nelson Schlatter (Ansell)

Zack Mansdorf

 

Sent from my iPhone 7



On Sep 17, 2021, at 5:32 AM, Bruce Van Scoy <bvanscoy**At_Symbol_Here**twc.com> wrote:

?

Caution:  If you are going to be citing the NIOSH Recommendations for Chemical Protective Clothing for glove guidance - check when it was published, it is severely dated.

Monona is right, look at the individual glove manufacturer for testing permeation and degradation information.  If you do a Google search, you'll end up with generic information that will be unreliable - depending upon which glove has been specified.  

Suppliers and Google will provide generic "data" but nothing I would rely upon when you really need to confirm adequate protection. 

It's late and I can't remember the name of the organic chemist who started the testing work at Ansell.  He developed the first spreadsheet, which later turned into their database.  When I ran into a new molecule that was going to be tested for toxicity as an investigational new drug, if he could not refer to a very close analog to provide protection, I could send him a sample and he would test to provide a recommendation.  It depends upon what you are trying to protect against.  Is a generic, possibly diluted level of protection adequate or are you trying to protect from a true hazard?

 

From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU> On Behalf Of Elliot Stein
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2021 7:23 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Glove permeation chart - not company