Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2022 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2022 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines (10 articles)

Date: Jan 27, 2022 18:08 UTC

Author: Daniel Crowl <crowl**At_Symbol_Here**MTU.EDU>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines (10 articles)

Date: Jan 27, 2022 18:22 UTC

Author: Ralph Stuart <ralph**At_Symbol_Here**rstuartcih.org>

Thread context

From: Daniel Crowl <crowl**At_Symbol_Here**MTU.EDU>

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines (10 articles)

Date: Jan 27, 2022 18:16 UTC

Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety

In-Reply-To: Re: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines (10 articles)

Demystify: 

HI Bob,

Whenever I did a hazards evaluation in the lab or even chemical plants we always had a robust discussion on the reliability of flammability / reactivity and even physical property data and whether it really applied to the specific situation.

When I taught a process safety or lab safety class to chemical engineering students I would frequently have the student's collect SDSs from a variety of sources to see the variability in the data. There was also a lot of variability in toxicty info.
I easily convinced them to use more than one source of information for hazard information and to do a critical review of this info.

Dan

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:38 AM Dr Bob <drbob**At_Symbol_Here**flowsciences.com> wrote:

Hi Dan!

I have had same issue with control values with fume hood ratings. (ASHRAE 110)

Thanks 4 info!

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post