About This Archive | DCHAS-L 2024 Index | DCHAS-L Yearly Index | DCHAS-L Home Page
Subject: [DCHAS-L] FW: Chemical Inventory / SDS online services
Date: Jan 9, 2024 17:39 UTC
Author: Ralph Stuart <membership**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] [NAOSMM] Rotovap Vacuums and Condensers
Date: Jan 9, 2024 19:07 UTC
Author: Craig Merlic <merlic**At_Symbol_Here**CHEM.UCLA.EDU>
From: Monona Rossol <0000030664c37427-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] [Safety3] [NAOSMM] Rotovap Vacuums and Condensers
Date: Jan 9, 2024 17:44 UTC
Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU>
Message-ID: <796399028.5824850.1704822247574**At_Symbol_Here**mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <CO6PR09MB7591D809817F25E0963413DDCB6A2**At_Symbol_Here**CO6PR09MB7591.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Is the building on 100% outside air or does the air recirculate.
Many years ago as an industrial hygienist, the campus had two wings of a lab science building. The wings were connected but were constructed at different times and had separate ventilation systems. The original wing recirculated about 80% of the air and the new wing was 100% outside air and did not recirculate any air.
Latex and rubber based products deteriorated much faster in the new wing. Turns out ozone was measurably higher in the new wing compared to the old wing. Ozone is incredibly detrimental to rubber based products.
Robyn Herring
Safety Manager
Washington State Department of Enterprise Services
c: 360-870-6411
f: 360-507-9260 | robyn.herring**At_Symbol_Here**des.wa.gov
From: Safety3 <safety3-bounces**At_Symbol_Here**listserv4.auburn.edu>
On Behalf Of James Kaufman
Sent: Monday, January 8, 2024 10:42 AM
External Email
I recall when the town of Newburyport, MA put in water discharge restrictions that caused Strem Chemical Co to stop using a water aspirator and purchase a separate vacuum pump. They added a cold trap to the line.
Why don't you do an experiment and put a cold trap between your Rotovap and the house vacuum? ... Jim
PS. LSI now has virtual lab inspections, safety program evaluations, document reviews, plus courses and seminars ... all virtual. And, a complimentary, updated version of our classic Laboratory Safety Guidelines is now available on our website ... https://www.labsafety.org/product/lab-safety-rules
James A. Kaufman, PhD
Founder/President Emeritus
The Laboratory Safety Institute (LSI)
A Non-profit Educational Organization
for Safety in Science, Industry, and Education
192 Worcester Street, Natick, MA 01760-2252
(O) 508-647-1900 (F) 508-647-0062 (C) 508-574-6264
Skype: labsafe; 508-401-7406 jkaufman**At_Symbol_Here**labsafety.org www.labsafety.org
Teach, Learn, and Practice Science Safely
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 1:26 PM Jeremy B. Vanderhyde <jeremy.vanderhyde**At_Symbol_Here**mail.wlc.edu> wrote:
Hello, fellow NAOSMMites!
Our school has recently begun questioning the equipment and procedures we use when rotovap-ing in our organic labs. Currently, we evaporate off using the house vacuum and condense using a cold-water coil condenser that is just connected to the domestic cold-water supply. I would just like some feedback and input as to what some of you are using and why.
For context, our science building is about 20 years old, and for many years has had a history of causing many latex/rubber/elastic objects to deteriorate in a short amount of time and in weird ways (anyone else have melting cabinet bumpers?) Administration and facilities have done a few things to try to get to the bottom of what could be causing this, and the most recent thing they've hit on is that it could possibly be vapors from the rotovap leaking into the air somewhere that is contributing to this. Our one-and-only organic professor admitted that only a fraction of the solvents that are boiled off are actually condensed and recaptured by the current condensing setup, so administration asked facilities to verify that the house vacuum vents outside (and not just into the pump room) which they were able to do. Even with that information, they are pursuing the idea of purchasing a stand-alone vacuum to put in a hood to pull the vacuum for the rotovap. In my mind, this would be a less optimal solution than using the house vac, at least from the standpoint of trying to release as few solvents into the building air as possible.
We are also looking at solutions to increase condensation rates such as an electric water chiller, which I think does make sense, but I'm also interested in hearing what you use for that.
Thanks in advance for any input!
Jeremy
-----
Jeremy Vanderhyde
Science Laboratory Services &
Building Manager, Generac Hall
Wisconsin Lutheran College
8800 W. Bluemound Rd.
Milwaukee, WI 53226
Work: 414-443-8766
Cell: 414-885-7762
To unsubscribe from this list please go to https://www.simplelists.com/confirm/?u=081No2djWumRgRXCvm6s7QkTYneAkNAY
The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.

