Alex,
A simple possibility is an aminolysis reaction. Since the solution was 44% ethyl acetate that is a huge amount of ester for reaction with amines to form amides. Anilines are usually less reactive than alkyl amines, but since there were p-phenylenediamines they are way more reactive. Aminolysis of simple esters is usually slow, but this waste bottle could have also contained traces of acidic or basic catalysts. That is not unlikely since phenylenediamines are so prone to decomposition.
This is simple to confirm or not – just do mass spec on the waste and look for acetamides of the p-phenylenediamines. No polymer as you wrote, just small molecules.
If this is correct, your suggestion to fill waste bottles to only 80% will not work. The reaction will still occur and since methanol has a low boiling point, reaction heat will cause pressure to build up. Hence, a venting cap might be appropriate here.
Best,
Craig
Craig A. Merlic
Professor of Chemistry, UCLA Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
Executive Director, UC Center for Laboratory Safety
From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU> on behalf of Alex Hagen <fischera**At_Symbol_Here**UW.EDU>
Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU>
Date: Thursday, February 8, 2024 at 2:24 PM
To: <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU>
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Input on chemical incident
Good morning,
We had a small hazardous waste incident in one of our labs recently, and I am trying to help the lab gather information on potential causes. A four-liter amber glass bottle of chemical waste containing 50% methanol, 44% ethyl acetate, and an assortment of six p-phenylenediamine antioxidants (PPDs) pressurized and broke open. The bottle was tightly capped and very full, it only had about 1.5 inches of space left at the top. The bottle broke open at the bottom of the bottle in a jagged formation. No polymerization of the contents was observed, but some speculated an event like that could have led to the pressurization of the container. I have already informed the lab that they should not fill waste containers more than 80%.
I have not been able to find information on similar events involving PPDs. Any input or information this group could provide about what may have led to this event is greatly appreciated.
Regards,
ALEX HAGEN, CCHO
Laboratory Safety Inspection Program Manager
Environmental Health & Safety Department
Research & Occupational Safety, Laboratory Safety Inspection Program
Hall Health / Box 354400 / Seattle, WA 98195-4400
206.221.2339 / mobile 206.713.5267 / fax 206.616.3360
fischera**At_Symbol_Here**uw.edu / www.ehs.washington.edu

This information is intended for the individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please notify the sender by reply email and then destroy all copies of the message and any attachments.
--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org