Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2025 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2025 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: None. Return to the 2025 Index

Date:  

Author:  

Next by Date

Subject: [DCHAS-L] Safety Intern Perspective

Date: Jan 2, 2025 14:59 UTC

Author: Neal Langerman <chemsaf**At_Symbol_Here**GMAIL.COM>

From: Janine Rhodes <00001f699f3e9b98-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU>

Subject: [DCHAS-L] Filtration syringes

Date: Jan 2, 2025 14:02 UTC

Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU>

Message-ID: <LV8PR13MB6559D5F3D2E2A99A719EA45AB9142**At_Symbol_Here**LV8PR13MB6559.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 

Our company purchases and sells filtration syringes for use with analytical test methods. Recently, our supplier of more than a decade denied our request to purchase, stating that the syringe was deemed by the manufacturer (BD) as a Prescription Medical Device.

 

We have been asked to provide regulatory evidence for sale, including exemption from Medical/Pharmaceutical licensure.  I have searched Federal code, and the closest thing I found was 21 CFR 801.125.  However, additional restrictions appear to be State dependent (we are in Maryland). Has anyone experienced this with filtration syringes before?  Were you able to identify the exemption statute?

 

Any suggestions for alternatives to BD syringes? Must be filtration disc compatible (screw tip) and NOT labeled for medical use.

 

Greatly appreciate your help!

 

Janine Rhodes

Return to the 2025 Index  |  Top of Page  |  Next post