From:
Info <info**At_Symbol_Here**ILPI.COM>
Subject:
Re: [DCHAS-L] Optimal Number of Students per TA/Instructor in General Chemistry Labs
Date:
Aug 26, 2025 13:13 UTC
Reply-To:
ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU>
Message-ID:
<4EB14FE9-E13E-4311-830B-55A46527D177**At_Symbol_Here**ilpi.com>
In-Reply-To:
<CABNxZ9eMwB2GSyBAPDXdWFiLR3VD=4m-MKXh+s1r2P9u+=rk0g**At_Symbol_Here**mail.gmail.com>
Not really my domain of expertise but occupancy load comes up in these articles, which are more focused on high schools, but are still relevant
https://www.nsta.org/blog/sciencestem-laboratory-occupancy-load-level-it-law
As most of you know, I have little tolerance for these kinds of things - and if it clearly cannot be resolved through channels nicely, my favorite tactic is to send a letter to University (legal) risk management office outlining your concerns that increased accidents are almost a certain possibility, citing the above data. CC to various folks in the org structure as appropriate. Nothing gets action better than a paper trail where you are calling out increased liability that, if ignored, will provide damning evidence in discovery once the inevitable happens.
Best wishes,
Rob Toreki
LabLocks™ - The first device that can lock out standard laboratory ball valves: https://www.safetyemporium.com/07400
US-Made NIOSH and FDA-approved N95 respirators: https://www.safetyemporium.com/safety-items/respirators/
Safety Emporium - Laboratory and Safety Supplies https://www.SafetyEmporium.comesales**At_Symbol_Here**safetyemporium.com or toll-free: (866) 326-5412Fax: (856) 553-6154, PO Box 1003, Blackwood, NJ 08012
On Aug 25, 2025, at 4:58 PM, Debbie Decker <debbie.m.decker**At_Symbol_Here**GMAIL.COM> wrote:
A couple of thoughts ....
My experience had lab sections limited to 24 students, working in pairs (mostly) with a dedicated TA. Additionally, there would be a senior TA (or two, depending on number of sections) who would float during the duration of the lab section to make sure TAs had support. Career staff with student workers supported laboratory instruction, set up the experiments and solved problems.
So 1:24 was the ratio and it was hard work for TA to appropriately supervise and suppport the students. 1:38 is bananas and risky for everyone involved. If this is a freshman course, that's even riskier because they don't know anything and can engage in shenanigans.
HTH
Good luck!
D-
Hello all,
We have had an explosion in the number of freshmen who are taking general chemistry this term, but funding has limited the number of TAs and instructors we have per lab room. The way the department has had
to deal with this is to increase the number of students from 30 to 38 per section (limited by the Fire Marshall’s maximum occupancy of the rooms). They work in groups of 3 (not ideal at all). We have adjoining labs, so our shortage of instructors has been
solved by having an instructor supervise two sections being held concurrently in a set of those labs. There is one TA per section.
In the past we have had 30 students (10 groups) supervised by a dedicated instructor (not working concurrent sections) and a TA, so about 15 students per person supervising. Now we can have as many as 38 students
(13 groups) being supervised by one person at times, as the instructor moves between sections. I feel this is not safe.
What do people think is a safe ratio of supervising people to students (or student groups)?
Thanks,
Patricia Leach
Lab Manager
Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry

SLC 3.513
Office: 972-883-6583
Cell: 469-891-6426
---
For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org
---
For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at
membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org