On Sep 11, 2025, at 2:20 PM, Samuella Sigmann <00001d2fb4580b5b-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU> wrote:

Be careful with assuming that you are not being exposed if you don't smell anything.  You can be exposed well below olfactory ability to detect on many chemicals.
S-

On 9/11/2025 11:18 AM, David EldrEdge wrote:

Thank you everyone for these excellent comments!

Emerging Consensus (Cross-Cutting Themes)

- SDS literacy is essential but insufficient → must supplement with PubChem LCSS, curated lists, hazard assessments

- Chemical lists/inventories must be provided to make physician consultation meaningful.

- Disclosure is voluntary (Title IX, Pregnancy Discrimination Act).

- Accommodations are common: modified roles, alternative assignments, deferment with no penalty.

- Ventilation/containment is under-discussed but critical: odors = exposure (Jon ASU).

- Legal backbone: Johnson Controls (1991) → institutions must protect both mother and unborn, cannot exclude, cannot offload responsibility.

Again, thank you all so very much. This input is extremely valuable.

We have some work to do. Just 40 minutes south of our campus, Utah Valley University has 12 mini fume hoods in every O-chem lab. That allows every pair of students to handle reagents and materials fully in the hood.

Thank you all again!

- Bruce Van Scoy emphasized that SDS literacy is essential, but this is insufficient on its own and must be supplemented with resources such as PubChem LCSS, curated lists, and hazard assessments (Sammye).

- Tessa Stewart and Rose Rakers showed that chemical lists and inventories must be provided in order to make physician consultation meaningful.

- Debbie Decker reminded us that disclosure is voluntary, reinforced by Title IX and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.

- Tricia Hahn, Sammye, and others highlighted that accommodations are common: modified roles, alternative assignments, or deferment with no penalty.

- Jon Klane noted that ventilation and containment are under-discussed but critical; if you can smell it, exposure is occurring.

- Catherine Situma shared Auburn University’s comprehensive reproductive health policy, which may serve as a strong model.

- Harry Elston pointed us toward ACS CCS legacy guidance, while Marta Guron recommended the Lane et al. (2022) article as a scholarly baseline.

- Jim Kaufman reminded us of the legal backbone from Johnson Controls (1991), which makes clear that institutions must protect both mother and unborn, -- cannot exclude, and cannot offload responsibility to a PCP.

Warm regards,

David EldrEdge

Co-Owner

NALTIC Industrials, LLC

de**At_Symbol_Here**naltic.com

www.naltic.com

888.891.0077 Main

435.503.4972 Cell

435.767.7714 Google Voice & Text

435.654.2727 Fax

On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 8:12 AM James Kaufman <jkaufman**At_Symbol_Here**labsafetyinstitute.org> wrote:

This unfortunately is contrary to the US Supreme Court decision in the United Autoworkers vs Johnson Controls 1991.

The employer must protect both the mother and unborn child.

The employer must understand the reproductive hazards of their chemicals.  They must train, inform and not hand it off to an employee's PCP (who may be totally clueless).

I had one related case that settled at 10 million.   ... Jim 

James A. Kaufman, Ph.D.
Founder, LSI
Serving Industry, Government, & Academia for 50 years
508-574-6264

On Wed, Sep 10, 2025, 11:05 AM Doug Cody <dsc1950**At_Symbol_Here**gmail.com> wrote:

When I was a member of Farmingdale State's chemistry faculty, the college policy was to make available a list of all chemicals to any student if they requested it. The students were then informed that guidance in this matter should come from their physician.

Doug Cody

Douglas S. Cody, CSP(RET), CSHM Emeritus, AA, BA, BS, MS, MA

Assistant Professor

Health Careers & PE Department – Ammerman - Fire Protection & Life Safety Studies

Natural Sciences – Grant - Chemistry

Past President of the American Society of Safety Professionals, LI Chapter

Past Chair NYSUT Health & Safety Committee

codyd**At_Symbol_Here**sunysuffolk.edu 

 

On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 9:21 AM David EldrEdge <Dave.EldrEdge**At_Symbol_Here**naltic.com> wrote:

Dear DCHAS Colleagues,

I'm a part time adjunct lab instructor at a community college. I would appreciate your advice on a situation in my organic chemistry teaching lab today.

One of my students confided last semester (in general chemistry II) that she has experienced multiple early pregnancy losses over the years and how heartbreaking that was for her. Now today, a brand new semester, in organic chemistry, she shared the joyful news that she is expecting and asked if there are concerns with her working with or handling today's lab materials.

I reached out to a nearby more experienced colleague just down the hall but received little direction beyond the idea that she should avoid handling chemicals directly and instead contribute through documentation and observations while her partner does the manipulations.

Today’s experiment was a simple extraction using naphthalene and benzoic acid, but the naphthalene odor became more noticeable as the first hour progressed even with good ventilation and fume hood use. Out of caution, I excused her from the lab after reviewing information that indicates naphthalene fumes can be problematic during pregnancy.

I would like to know from this group:

• Do your institutions have written policies or guidelines for mothers-to-be in teaching labs?

• Are there specific substances (like naphthalene or common solvents) you flag as higher-risk during pregnancy?

• How do you balance protecting health while still supporting a student’s educational progress?

Given her personal history, I want to be proactive in safeguarding her well-being while keeping her on track academically. Any perspectives, examples, or resources would be very helpful.

David EldrEdge

Co-Owner

NALTIC Industrials, LLC

de**At_Symbol_Here**naltic.com

www.naltic.com

888.891.0077 Main

435.503.4972 Cell

435.767.7714 Google Voice & Text

435.654.2727 Fax

ᐧ

--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org

--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org

--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org

ᐧ

--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org

-- 

******************************************************************************

 

Samuella B. Sigmann, MS, NRCC-CHO

ACS Committee on Chemical Safety, Chair 2022-2024

ACS Fellow, 2023

ACS Division of Chemical Health & Safety, Fellow & 2019 Chair,

Appalachian State University, Retired

Phone: 336 877 5147

Email: sigmannsb**At_Symbol_Here**retired.appstate.edu

 

 

--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org