From:
Bridget Morris <0000193824b50d68-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU>
Subject:
Re: [DCHAS-L] Evaporating of flammable liquid in a fridge
Date:
Mar 10, 2026 21:05 UTC
Reply-To:
ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU>
Message-ID:
<AS1PR02MB7821E16BDFBE1AFCEA9860288546A**At_Symbol_Here**AS1PR02MB7821.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To:
<CY4PR04MB1255A7512E5F08C1948080BCA746A**At_Symbol_Here**CY4PR04MB1255.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
My suggestion would be to place the samples into a jacketed vessel in a hood with a circulating chilled/refrigerated water bath running through the jacket that was outside the hood.
From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU> on behalf of Pemberton, Drew (apemberton**At_Symbol_Here**uidaho.edu) <0000231dd2f469c4-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU>
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2026 1:15:14 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU>
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Evaporating of flammable liquid in a fridge
| CAUTION:
This email originated from outside the organisation. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the contact is safe.
|
Hello all, I could use some advice!
I have a researcher who is wanting to evaporate some methanol from some samples over the course of a few days at low temp (~4C). They had planned on doing this inside their fridge, but luckily was in a safety meeting where I mentioned
that flammable liquids should not be stored inside a non-flammable rated fridge and reached out to me for an alternative.
They were thinking of getting a small mini-fridge (think like one of those soda can fridges) and sticking it inside a fume hood with a straw or something else stuck into the door crack to allow for some ventilation. After doing some back
of the envelope math, at fridge temps the saturated concentration of methanol would be around 53000 ppm, which is a bit too close for the LEL of methanol (around 60000ppm) for my comfort. I’m not sure what else would be a good alternative.
Anyone have any thoughts on this? Would this be an acceptable level of risk? Has anyone dealt with a flammable liquid evaporation scenario at low temps (or any temps) like this before? Appreciate any input!
Regards,
|
DREW PEMBERTON
Laboratory Safety Officer
Environmental Health and Safety
apemberton**At_Symbol_Here**uidaho.edu
Office: 208-885-5031
Mailing Address: 875 Perimeter Dr MS2030 | Moscow ID 83844 | United States
|
|
Physical Address:1108 W 6th St | Moscow ID 83844 | United States
|
--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at
membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org