Jul 6, 1989 - Labeling and material safety data sheet requirements under the Hazard Communication Standard.Jul 6, 1989 - Labeling and material safety data sheet…
The Home page of ILPI's Safety Data Sheet (SDS) Resource, the leader in SDS information since 1995!
The history and philosophy behind this resource.
A curated collection of books and reference materials concerning Safety Data Sheets and closely related topics.
Paste your plain text SDS into the SDS-Demystifier, and it will be converted into a hypertext-enriched document with links to detailed explanations of each key term.
An extensive list of frequently asked questions about Safety Data Sheets including regulations, content, compliance, and more.
A humorous take on Safety Data Sheet jargon. Fill in the blanks on our entry form to generate a personalized Unsafety Data Sheet to share with your coworkers.
Since 1995, we've maintained this massive curated list of the best places to find Safety Data Sheets on the Internet.
Way more than a glossary, this hypertext-enhanced resource covers hundreds of SDS-related terms and expert knowledge. Each entry includes both the SDS relevance and links to additional authoritative resources.
Archived results of Safety Data Sheet related polls taken by some of our millions of site visitors
You are here! The OSHA regulations behind SDS regulations, including the inspection guidelines and over 400 official interpretations letters under the Hazard Communication Standard
Commercial suppliers of SDS authoring and management software as well as cloud compliance services.
Commercial companies that will create SDS's for your specific needs as well as SDS translation companies.
Safety signs, banners, and scoreboards? Get yours at Safety Emporium!
OSHA Hazard Communication Letters of Interpretation
Labeling and material safety data sheet requirements under the Hazard Communication Standard.
ILPI assessment: Identifiable responsible party remains required; modern contact elements apply
This letter addresses the obsolete 1987 version of the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS). Its central HazCom conclusion remains useful: anonymous letter codes do not replace required supplier/responsible-party identification, and altering required information can create responsibility for its accuracy.
This comparison with current requirements is not a finding that OSHA has formally withdrawn this letter. This assessment reflects editorial judgment informed by human review and AI assistance. It is an opinion, may contain errors or omissions, and is not an official OSHA determination. For guidance on how OSHA requirements apply to your circumstances, contact your local OSHA office.
OSHA's notice about interpretation letters
The following notice is published on OSHA's interpretation pages; it is general guidance, not a letter-specific withdrawal notice.
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
This is in response to your letter of February 8, addressed to Mr. Thomas J. Shepich, regarding labeling and material safety data sheet (MSDS) requirements under the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS), 29 CFR 1910.1200. Please accept my apology for the delay in response.
Your first issue deals with the "responsible party." According to the HCS, the "responsible party" means someone who can provide additional information on the hazardouschemical and appropriate emergency procedures, if necessary. This definition applies to chemical manufacturers, importers, and distributors. If your client wishes to list the name, address, and emergency telephone number of the actual manufacturer, the designation of "manufacturer" rather than "responsible party" must be used for clarity.
Regarding your second issue on labeling, the standard specifically requires the name and address of the chemicalmanufacturer, importer or other responsible party to be identified on the label. Replacing this information with an "A", "B", or "C" is not acceptable on containers leaving the workplace. The label information, in some situations, provides the only identifying and hazard information to employees handling the chemical. Also, employers that do not receive the MSDS with the initial shipment must request one from the chemical manufacturer or distributor. The label again provides the only identifying information.
In all cases, the "responsible party" named on the MSDS and the label is held responsible for the accuracy of the information and potentially subject to citation if a violation of the HCS was determined to exist. If the distributor makes changes to the required information on the labels and the MSDSs, the distributor then assumes responsibility.
We hope we have adequately addressed your client's concerns. We apologize for any inconvenience caused by the delay in response. If you need further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us again.