Check out Safety Emporium for your N95, N99, and face shield needs.
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:44:58 -0500
Reply-To: List Moderator <approval1**At_Symbol_Here**esf.uvm.edu>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: List Moderator <approval1**At_Symbol_Here**esf.uvm.edu>
Subject: Re: Laboratory Risk Statement
Bryan added an additional comment when I asked permission to pass his
initial reply along.
From: "Franklin, Bryan - Geismar, LA"
Subject: RE: [DCHAS-L] Laboratory Risk Statement
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:55:52 -0500
As a general statement, such as would be found on a syllabus, this is good.
It contains the necessary elements, i.e. a statement of the risk, means of
protection and the source of additional information. I reviewed this with
one of our corporate safety auditors as well as my immediate superior, who
has 10+ years experience with OSHA. They agreed that this was a very good
general warning provided, of course, that the Health and Safety Plan for the
facility contained more detailed information.
Bryan K. Franklin, CSP
PSM Coordinator
Crompton Corporation
Geismar, LA
>From: "Franklin, Bryan - Geismar, LA"
>Subject: RE: [Fwd: Laboratory Risk Statement] responses to DCHAS-L?
>Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:41:09 -0500
>
>I certainly have no objection to passing it on. But looking at the answers
>that have been coming back, it seems that many people are replying as if
>this statement on the syllabus is the ONLY HAZCOM info given to the
>students/instructors. My answer was based only on the question of whether
>the statement was adequate as a broad statement for a course outline,
>pre-registration description or syllabus.
>
>Bryan K. Franklin, CSP
>PSM Coordinator
>Crompton Corporation
>Geismar, LA
>
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post