Bryan added an additional comment when I asked permission to pass his initial reply along. From: "Franklin, Bryan - Geismar, LA"
Subject: RE: [DCHAS-L] Laboratory Risk Statement Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:55:52 -0500 As a general statement, such as would be found on a syllabus, this is good. It contains the necessary elements, i.e. a statement of the risk, means of protection and the source of additional information. I reviewed this with one of our corporate safety auditors as well as my immediate superior, who has 10+ years experience with OSHA. They agreed that this was a very good general warning provided, of course, that the Health and Safety Plan for the facility contained more detailed information. Bryan K. Franklin, CSP PSM Coordinator Crompton Corporation Geismar, LA >From: "Franklin, Bryan - Geismar, LA" >Subject: RE: [Fwd: Laboratory Risk Statement] responses to DCHAS-L? >Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:41:09 -0500 > >I certainly have no objection to passing it on. But looking at the answers >that have been coming back, it seems that many people are replying as if >this statement on the syllabus is the ONLY HAZCOM info given to the >students/instructors. My answer was based only on the question of whether >the statement was adequate as a broad statement for a course outline, >pre-registration description or syllabus. > >Bryan K. Franklin, CSP >PSM Coordinator >Crompton Corporation >Geismar, LA >
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post