Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2004 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2004 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: Latex Glove degeneration

Date: Jul 27, 2004 14:59 UTC

Author: Stu Williams <skwill**At_Symbol_Here**U.ARIZONA.EDU>

Next by Date

Subject: FW: [DCHAS-L] Latex Glove degeneration

Date: Jul 27, 2004 19:55 UTC

Author: Galloway, Jan - Middlebury, CT <Jan_Galloway**At_Symbol_Here**CROMPTONCORP.COM>

Subject context

From: List Moderator <approval**At_Symbol_Here**ESF.UVM.EDU>

Subject: Re: Latex Glove degeneration

Date: Jul 27, 2004 16:37 UTC

Reply-To: List Moderator

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 
From: "Diane Amell" 
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:12:34 -0500
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Latex Glove degeneration

Not to be morbid, but doesn't anyone remember what happened to Dr. Karen
Wetterhahn of Dartmouth College when she used latex gloves to protect
herself from dimethylmercury exposure? Federal OSHA standard 1910.132
requires that a hazard assessment be performed to identify the specific
hazards requiring personal protective equipment and to provide each
employee with PPE designed to protect against the identified hazards.
This requirement includes "appropriate hand protection" against "skin
absorption of harmful substances" under 1910.138. California, being an
OSHA state plan state, would have adopted the same or a more stringent
standard for public employers.

Having said all that, have you checked the building for UV light
levels, including sunlight? It is no friend to either latex or
photographs.

- Diane Amell, MNOSHA

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post