Previous by Date: Subject: More chemical splashes Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 13:42:55 -0800 Author: NEAL LANGERMAN
Next by Date: Subject: Re: Salary Question Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 16:13:59 -0500 Author: Russ Phifer
Demystify:
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 16:39:49 -0600
Reply-To: ceas**At_Symbol_Here**STOLAF.EDU
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: ceas**At_Symbol_Here**STOLAF.EDU
Subject: low-flow fume hoods
Comments: To: CSHEMA-L**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.UMN.EDU
In-Reply-To: <4404AA0B.5050206**At_Symbol_Here**stolaf.edu>
text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
My apologies for the crossposting...
There are a number of companies who now build low-flow fume hoods, and (at
least according to their websites) meet ANSI/ASHRAE 110 for the assorted
containment tests. If you have used such hoods or are considering such
hoods could you tell me about your experiences (reliability, maintenance,
savings in operating costs, etc.). If there is a large response I will
post a summary to the listservs.
Thanks.
Pat
The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org. The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.
