Sat, 4 Mar 2006 17:03:50 -0500
Author: Ralph Stuart
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 11:28:06 -0800
Reply-To: "Harvey L. Claussen" <cei**At_Symbol_Here**FASTMAIL.FM>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: "Harvey L. Claussen" <cei**At_Symbol_Here**FASTMAIL.FM>
Thanks for all of the helpful input on our Respirator question. Many folks also asked questions which I will try to answer briefly: Standards: The requirement of the current application is to be certified for the highest NIOSH/OSHA standards now being met by the best chemical/particulate respirators. This mask is strictly an APR, not an SCBA and has a mask shape different than most SCBAs. Performance: (I probably should not have emphasized the low cost factor.) The cost-effectiveness of this mask is the result of advanced design and the use of emerging manufacturing methods. You all have us taking a more serous look at the broader applications for this respirator. Again, this group has been very helpful and any additional input is welcome! Harvey L. Claussen PE Claussen Engineering Inc 1631 NE Broadway #157 Portland OR 97232 503-230-9662 The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post