DCHAS-L Archives ยท Post dated May 3, 2007
From: Diane Amell <Diane.Amell**At_Symbol_Here**STATE.MN.US>
Subject: Re: Hg vapor detection
Date: May 3, 2007 21:35 UTC
Reply-To: Diane Amell <Diane.Amell**At_Symbol_Here**STATE.MN.US>
In-Reply-To:
On page 4 of the report listed below, the MN Dept. of Health has a table listing four different meters and their features: www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/hazardous/sites/ramsey/stpaulhg0901.pdf The report is actually on a house contaminated with mercury, but further in the report there is some discussion on comparing results by two of the different meters. See www.pca.state.mn.us/publications/p-p2s4-02.pdf for information on the MN Pollution Control Agency's newest "meter". (They have also used Lumex and Tekran meters). As for us, we had a Jerome meter that is now obsolete and no longer used. We do personal air sampling for those few cases when mercury is an issue. - Diane Amell, MNOSHA >>> Russell Vernon5/3/2007 11:45 AM >>> Dear DivCHAS Members, Other than the Jerome 431X and the Reliable Instruments MVA-1 what, if any portable mercury vapor analyzers might you be able to recommend? Thanks, -Russ Russell Vernon, Ph.D. UC System-wide Field Safety Working Group Chair http://ehs55.ehs.uci.edu/fieldsafe/index.jsp <http://ehs55.ehs.uci.edu/fieldsafe/index.jsp> Laboratory / Research Safety Specialist & Integrated Waste Manager Environmental Health & Safety University of California, Riverside 900 University Ave. Riverside, CA 92521 russell.vernon**At_Symbol_Here**ucr.edu www.ehs.ucr.edu Direct: (951) 827-5119 Admin: (951) 827-5528 Fax: (951) 827-5122