Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:37:56 -0400
Reply-To: "Samuella B. Sigmann" <sigmannsb**At_Symbol_Here**APPSTATE.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: "Samuella B. Sigmann" <sigmannsb**At_Symbol_Here**APPSTATE.EDU>
Subject: Re: Research chemicals of unknown toxicity
Comments: To: Russell Vernon
In-Reply-To: <8BD786EE2CA681409315A8E4B7420BE626A5BC**At_Symbol_Here**VCAMAIL.vcadmin.vcaitad.ucr.edu>

Hi Russ - I would agree with your inclination per
*
> *1910.1450(h)(2)(ii)*
>
>     If the chemical produced is a byproduct whose composition is not
>     known, the employer shall assume that the substance is hazardous
>     and shall implement paragraph (e) of this section.
>
*Also, I don't think that asking the EPA for the MSDS is out of line. 
They should have supplied one under

> *1910.1450(h)(2)(iii)*
>
>     *If the chemical substance is produced for another user outside of
>     the laboratory, the employer shall comply with the Hazard
>     Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200) including the
>     requirements for preparation of material safety data sheets and
>     labeling.*
>
Sammye
-- 
***************************************************************************************

Donít always believe what you think.

Samuella B. Sigmann, NRCC-CHO
Lecturer/Safety Committee Chair
A. R. Smith Department of Chemistry
Appalachian State University
525 Rivers Street
Boone, NC 28608
Phone: 828 262 2755
Fax: 828 262 6558
Email: sigmannsb**At_Symbol_Here**appstate.edu


Russell Vernon wrote:
> Dear fellow ACS Div-CHAS members,
>
> I'm looking for advice on what you tell your people about working with
> chemicals of unknown toxicity.
>
> In my current case, I have a researcher who will administer a compound
> she is getting from a colleague at the EPA to mice. Some ata I have on
> similar compounds show those chemical to be 'not very toxic' but I can
> not find any information about this stuff.
>
> I only half-jokingly suggested she obtain an MSDS from the EPA as they
> are the supplier.
>
> I'm inclined to tell them to treat the material as highly toxic and
> collect the metabolites found in the mouse bedding/feces/urine and
> handle as hazardous waste. At least until they have more information
> about the hazards.
>
> Do you agree? Do you have any particular guidance you would care to
> share?
>
>
> Thanks in advance!
> -Russ
>
>  Russell Vernon, Ph.D. 
> UC System-wide Field Safety Working Group Chair
> www.ehs.uci.edu/apps/fieldsafe/index.jsp 
> Laboratory / Research Safety Specialist, Integrated Waste Manager and
> Interim Hazardous Materials Manager
> Environmental Health & Safety 
> University of California, Riverside 
> 900 University Ave. 
> Riverside, CA 92521 
> russell.vernon**At_Symbol_Here**ucr.edu 
> www.ehs.ucr.edu 
> Direct: (951) 827-5119
> Admin: (951) 827-5528
> Fax: (951) 827-5122
> Register now for the UCR Emergency Notification System!
>   

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.