Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2009 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2009 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: design architectural firms

Date: May 13, 2009 19:59 UTC

Author: Suzanne Howard <showard**At_Symbol_Here**WELLESLEY.EDU>

Next by Date

Subject: Safety Workshops

Date: May 14, 2009 15:41 UTC

Author: NEAL LANGERMAN <neal**At_Symbol_Here**CHEMICAL-SAFETY.COM>

Subject context

From: Crooks, Steven <scrooks**At_Symbol_Here**RTI.ORG>

Subject: Re: design architectural firms

Date: May 13, 2009 19:59 UTC

Reply-To: "Crooks, Steven"

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 

Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 10:35:12 -0400
Reply-To: "Crooks, Steven" <scrooks**At_Symbol_Here**RTI.ORG>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: "Crooks, Steven" <scrooks**At_Symbol_Here**RTI.ORG>
Subject: Requirements for UL or other NRTL certs for tube furnaces?
Sent by Steve Crooks via GoodLink

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Crooks, Steven
Sent:	Thursday, May 14, 2009 10:21 AM Eastern Standard Time
To:	'DCAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU'
Subject:	Requirements for UL or other NRTL certs for tube furnaces?

General query to list to see if any consensus and/or rationale exists to 
require selection of only tested/certified furnaces? It generally seems 
better than not but when faced with contemplating such a requirement and 
the resulting financial impact, you all know how the safety department 
will be asked to produce regulatory, code or other (e.g., industry 
accepted practice) logic.  If you have any, thanks in advance for 
sharing.
  

Sent by Steve Crooks via GoodLink

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post