Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:39:53 -0700
Reply-To: "Debbie M. Decker" <dmdecker**At_Symbol_Here**UCDAVIS.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: "Debbie M. Decker" <dmdecker**At_Symbol_Here**UCDAVIS.EDU>
Subject: FW: Family of UCLA lab fire victim criticizes investigation,
By Kim Chistensen, Los Angeles Times, 6/22/09
Comments: To: UCIH Program Management Group

From: Susan

Family of UCLA lab fire victim criticizes investigation, By Kim Chistensen, Los Angeles Times, 6/22/09

State regulators performed a shoddy investigation and let UCLA off too lightly for violations stemming from a chemistry lab fire that killed a staff research assistant, the victim's family contends in papers f iled with Cal-OSHA and the Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board.

Sheri Sangji, 23, suffered severe burns over 43% of her body when an experi ment with air-sensitive chemicals burst into flame Dec. 29 and ignited her cloth ing. Sangji, who was not wearing a protective lab coat, died 18 days later.

Last month, the California Division of Occupational Sa fety and Health concluded that Sangji was improperly trained and not wearing protective clothing. Cal-OSHA cited UCLA for one regulatory and three "serious" violations, levying fines totaling $31,875.

UCLA paid the fines but appealed the violations and is seeking a stipulatio n from Cal-OSHA that it admits no fault in connection with the findings -- a legal move aimed at limiting the university's liability.

Sangji's family followed with its own appeal, asking the state board to upg rade all four violations to "willful" and "repeat" status -- with penalties of up to $70,000 each.

It was rejected last week, however, because only emplo yers may appeal. So Sangji's family has filed motions with the board to become a party to UCLA's appeal, in hopes of making its case for harsher penalties t hat way. The University Professional and Technical Employees union, which represents UCLA chemistry lab workers, also has asked to participate in a yet-to-be scheduled appeal hearing.

Sangji, who had worked in Professor Patrick Harran's organic chemistry lab for less than three months, was transferring up to 2 ounces of t-butyl lithium from one sealed container to another when a plastic syringe came apart in her ha nds, spewing a chemical compound that ignites when exposed to air.

Harran and UCLA officials have described it as a tragic accident, saying Sangji had done the experiment before and was usi ng appropriate methods. They also have corrected the four violations cited by Cal-OSHA, as well as nearly a dozen others noted in an internal inspection of the lab two months before the fire. Most were not fixed by the time of Sang ji's accident, records show.

"UCLA has cooperated fully with multiple independent investigations conducted in the wake of the tragic accident and is confident in the independence and comprehensive nature of those reviews," UCLA spokesma n Phil Hampton said, declining further comment.

Cal-OSHA spokesman Dean Fryer also declined to comment, saying that neither he nor the investigator on the Sangji case could discuss it because of the pen ding appeal.

In a June 18 letter to the head of Cal-OSHA, Naveen Sangji blasted the investigation as "absolutely inadequate" and said it "barely addressed" the factors in her sister's death.

"The investigation does not address whether the equipment Sheri was us ing that day was appropriate for the experiment or whether it (hood, vacuum, in ert gas) was properly functioning," she wrote.

Sangji's letter also alleges that the investigator ignored key information she relayed to him from her critically burned sister, including that she had ma de three transfers each of 50 milliliters, or about 1.7 ounces. The investigat or's report, obtained through a California Public Records Act request, put the volume of t-butyl lithium at 20 milliliters.

"Not only does this evince shoddy investigation and the investigator's complete disregard of information provided by the family, but also is significant given that it may be illegal to transfer a volume of 50 ml of tert-butyl lithium with a syringe in the state of California; further it is not recommended by the manufacturer," the letter stated.

The family also contends that the investigator ignored a UCLA fire marshal' s report, which quoted Harran as saying th at Sangji probably was transferring 40 to 50 milliliters of the chemical and t hat a different method would have been preferred for that amount.

The investigator also failed to take into account UCLA fire officials' init ial concerns that the accident scene had been tampered with, Sangji's letter sa ys.

On the night of the fire, a deputy fire marshal had ordered Harran and his researchers to stay out of the lab, which was then locked and secur ed with plastic crime-scene tape, records show. But the next morning, the depu ty reported, he found that some 5-gallon drums of improperly stored flammable liquids were gone, and other items had been moved around.

There also was no sign of a container of highly flammable hexane that Sheri Sangji said had spilled and fueled the flash fire that engulfed her, accord ing to a report by Los Angeles fire officials who interviewed her shortly afterward.

When UCLA fire officials interviewed Harran on Feb. 5, he said he knew nothing about the hexane. He acknowledged asking tw o researchers to clean up the lab and remove the drums, but said he had no ulterior motive.

"I just wanted to get all those drums out," he said. "It was my fault. . . . And it didn't relate to the accident, but it just looked bad."

The suspected tampering triggered a criminal investigation by UCLA police, who concluded in January that no crime had been committed, records show. Cal-OS HA's Bureau of Investigation has launched its own probe, as it routinely does in death cases, to determine if there is evidence of a crime. Fryer would say only that it is ongoing. 2009jun22,0,4333432.story?track=rss< /o:p>

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.