DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 08:42:47 -0800
Reply-To: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: Gordon Kroemer <gkroeme**At_Symbol_Here**LINFIELD.EDU>
Subject: Re: 2 RE: [DCHAS-L] Paraformaldehyde - carcinogen or not?
In-Reply-To: <C9E3F3C4-5E33-4718-81BE-4DB81683C9DE**At_Symbol_Here**uvm.edu>
I beg your pardon. If formaldehyde is being exhaled, the last time I
checked, it would have to pass the mucous tissues of the mouth or nose.
Unless you have another way of respiring.
Gordon J. Kroemer, CSP, NRCC-CHO
Director, Office of Environment, Health & Safety
Linfield College
900 SE Baker Street, A468
McMinnville, OR 97128
503-883-2431
503-883-2781 fax
On 04/12/09 04:33, "List Moderator" wrote:
> From: "Allan Astrup Jensen"
> Date: December 4, 2009 3:31:28 AM EST
> Subject: RE: [DCHAS-L] Paraformaldehyde - carcinogen or not?
>
>> Just to refresh the memory of some folks, recall formaldehyde is present
in
>> the 1 carbon metabolic cycle so our bodies contain lots of formaldehyde.
I
>> understand that formaldehyde has been measured in exhaled breath at 1-2
ppb.
>> The dose does make the poison!!
>
>
> OK, Roger, but the internal exposures are not gaseous hitting mucous tiss
ues
> of the nose!
>
> Yours truly,
> Allan Astrup Jensen
>
> Technical Vice President
> Secretariat for Quality Management and Metrology
>
> FORCE Technology, Br=F8ndby
> Park All=E9 345
> 2605 Br=F8ndby
> Denmark
>
> Phone: +45 43 26 70 00
> Direct: +45 43 26 70 81
> Mobile: +45 40 94 10 22
> Fax: +45 43 26 70 11
> e-mail: aaj**At_Symbol_Here**force.dk
> www: www.forcetechnology.com
>
>
> ===
>
> From: "David Bunzow"
> Date: December 4, 2009 6:11:48 AM EST
> Subject: RE: [DCHAS-L] Paraformaldehyde - carcinogen or not?
>
> =8Awhich is why the Delaney clause never made good toxicological sense. We
> live, therefore we die.
> David
>
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post
