Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 10:01:45 -0400
Reply-To: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: Ben Ruekberg <bruekberg**At_Symbol_Here**CHM.URI.EDU>
Subject: Re: 3 re: Hg response
In-Reply-To: <CC62FC1FA655004D894C7FF8294A21B346D4DF**At_Symbol_Here**wbrb07.ft.corp>

break-word;-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space'>

I cannot dispute any of your facts, however, I have found some other information that might have a bearing on the immediate hazard evaluation.=A0 I would point out that even if mercury vapors penetrate the barriers mentioned as methyl mercury does, there is, nonetheless, a difference between mercury and methyl mercury.=A0=A0 Again, it is the rate at which the mercury reacts in order to behave toxically.=A0 As far as I know, this also is relatively slow, and “as it goes in, so it goes out.”=A0 Methyl mercury is clearly another story and as I recall it arises (in nature) from the action of bacteria on mercury. =A0The entry for mercury in Deichmann and Gerarde’s Toxicolgory of Drugs and Chemicals (1969) begins “The amount of liquid metal [mercury] accidentally ingested when a thermometer bulb is broken in the mouth is harmless.”=A0 (This may be in anticipation of the most common concern when consulting their work.)=A0 Nonetheless, one may deduce that the mercury (from such an acute exposure) leaves the body before causing significant harm.

According to=A0 I. Langmuir=A0 in Physical Reviews (vol. 8, # 4, 1916, pp 149 – 176), the maximum rate of pure mercury evaporation at 100 degrees C in perfect vacuum was said to be 0.0117 g cm^ -2 sec^ -1.=A0 Assuming that the standard dependence of rate on temperature (doubling for every 10 degrees C increase) applies, at 20 degrees, this would mean that the rate would be 1/256 of that rate.

D.J. Benjamin (Materials Research Bulletin, vol 19, #4, 1984, pp. 443 – 450, the abstract thereto) 17 hours exposure of mercury to moist air (which is not unlikely to have occurred before the mercury in question was brought to the school) causes oxidation that reduces the rate of evaporation by a factor of about 1000.

Based on the above, the rate of evaporation of mercury at 20 degrees C would be about 4.6 X 10^ -5 mg cm^ -2 sec^-1.=A0 Given that a square centimeter of mercury seems pretty big for the case in question, and given reasonable air exchange, I would be inclined to stick with my assessment that excessive alarm is not warranted.

Thank you for your indulgence,

Ben


From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU] On Behalf Of Allan Astrup Jensen
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 8:24 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] 3 re: Hg response

The evaporation rate of mercury is fast (4 times butyl acetate)!  The vapours are heavy and will concentrate more at the floor. The vapours will penetrate the blood-brain and the blood-placenta barriers as methyl mercury do; thus a special risk for pregnant women.

 

It is correct that 5 mg Hg will not produce deadly concentrations in an average room but easily higher concentrations than many establish limit values (see table):

 

Tabel: Limit values in North america for mercury air exposures (Caravati et al., 2008; Richardson et al., 2009; a.o.).

Air concentration (mg/m3)

Explanation< /b>

Authority

10

Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health (IDLH) (30 min)

NIOSH

0,5

Limit value for short-term exposures

WHO

0,1

Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL-TWA)

OSHA

0,05

Time-weighed average concentration (TWA)

NIOSH< /span>

0,025< /span>

Threshold Limit Value (TLV)

ACGIH< /span>

0,03

Recommended concentration after commercial cleaning

ATSDR< /span>

0,001< /span>

Recommended inhalation zone limit in homes after spill

ATSDR< /span>

0,0018

Reference Exposure Level (REL), (1 hour)

CalEPA

0,0003

Reference Concentration (RfC)

USEPA< /span>

0,0002

Minimum Risk Level (MRL)

ATSDR< /span>

0,00006

Reference Exposure Level (REL), long term concentration

Health Canada

0,00003

Reference Exposure Level (REL), long term concentration

CalEPA

 

Yours truly,

Allan Astrup Jensen

Technical Vice President
Secretariat for Metrology, Chemical analysis and Management Systems

FORCE Technology, Br=F8ndby
Park All=E9 345
2605 Br=F8ndby
Denmark

Phone: +45 43 26 70 00
Direct: +45 43 26 70 81
Mobile: +45 40 94 10 22
Fax: +45 43 26 70 11
e-mail:
aaj**At_Symbol_Here**force.dk
www:
www.forcetechnology.com

*************************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential
information intended for the addressee(s) only. The information is not to be
surrendered or copied to unauthorised persons. If you have received
this communication in error, please notify us immediately by email at: info**At_Symbol_Here**forcetechnology.com
*************************************************************************


From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**list.uvm.edu] On Behalf Of Ben Ruekberg
Sent: 11. maj 2010 13:43
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] 3 re: Hg response

Not wishing to be disputatious concerning the hazards of mercury, nonetheless, I think before worrying about the saturation vapor pressure of mercury, I suspect that one should also consider the rate of evaporation of mercury as well.  I don’t know what it is, but were it all that significant people would probably have to have been refilling McLoed gauges with some frequency.  In fact, I don’t recall that ever being necessary, nor do I recall finding significant amounts of mercury in the Nitrogen traps of vacuum systems under normal circumstances.  Given that most rooms have reasonable air exchange, I suspect that rooms seldom reach saturation.

To refer to the example of 5 mg of mercury reaching the saturation concentration of 15 mg m^-3, one would be dealing with a room with a volume of 1/3 m^3, an unusually small room.  A 20’ X 20’ X 10’ room would hold (at saturation, with no air exchange) ~ 1.6 g of mercury, a mere drop, but if a drop of mercury evaporated at a significant rate an amount that might be noticeable.

What I am suggesting is that the rate of evaporation might be more important than the saturation vapor pressure and may reduce the hazard (at least for the short term) and that one might not need to be overly alarmed.

Thank you,

Ben


From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU] On Behalf Of List Moderator
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 7:16 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] 3 re: Hg response

From: "Allan Astrup Jensen" <aaj**At_Symbol_Here**force.dk>

Date: May 11, 2010 5:26:29 AM EDT

Subject: RE: [DCHAS-L] 3 re: Hg response

Please, don’t underestimate the danger of mercury vapour!

Mercury vapour is dangerous, and it is difficult to clean up indoor spills completely. Even the 5 mg Hg from a crushed light bulb indoors can create dangerous air concentrations, as many publications have shown. The saturated air concentration at room temperature is about 15 mg Hg/m3. That concentration is 500 times higher than the TLV, and such exposures have resulted in serious intoxications.

 

Yours truly,

Allan Astrup Jensen 

Technical Vice President 

Secretariat for Metrology, Chemical analysis and Management Systems 

FORCE Technology, Br=F8ndby 

Park All=E9 345 

2605 Br=F8ndby 

Denmark 

Phone: +45 43 26 70 00 

Direct: +45 43 26 70 81 

Mobile: +45 40 94 10 22 

Fax: +45 43 26 70 11 

e-mail: aaj**At_Symbol_Here**force.dk

www: www.forcetechnology.com

************************************************** *********************** 

This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential 

information intended for the addressee(s) only. The information is not to be 

surrendered or copied to unauthorised persons. If you have received 

this communication in error, please notify us immediately by email at: info**At_Symbol_Here**forcetechnology.com 

************************************************** ***********************

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.