DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:10:25 -0700
Reply-To: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: Eric Clark <erclark**At_Symbol_Here**PH.LACOUNTY.GOV>
Subject: Re: Emergency Action Plan for science labs
Comments: To: Don Wanamaker
In-Reply-To: <2A30C986C0BD44A0A81AB9A0F2A0F58C**At_Symbol_Here**EML102>
Maybe you're right, Don. These things all look like car batteries - and
the USP chassis is called a "Battery Cabinet" and they're 12V DC devices
containing lead and sulfuric acid, and I could probably use one to jump
start my car if I had to (looks like a duck). But the Fire Dept asked me
to include the lead and sulfuric acid on the substance inventory, and I
did because it was easier to add it to the list than to challenge them on
it.
Here's what they said, and it made sense to me: Firefighters bring up
that CR2K database on a laptop in the truck on the way out to a fire so
the scene commander knows what they're up against when the arrive.
Firefighters just don't just automatically run into burning buildings
anymore, and when they do they want to know what's in there.
And now that Monona said these things might flame up unexpectedly - but
very rarely (geeesh!) ... well, it seems like reporting that material is
an even better idea now.
>>> Don Wanamaker 7/12/2010 10:49 AM >>>
Eric/Kathleen,
Wouldn't the Uninterupted Power Supply as described be excluded from
compliance with Community Right To Know requirements since the batteries
are
consumer products and/or articles as defined by OSHA? This question
comes
up often for quantities above certain thresholds and becomes very onerous
if
the local jurisdiction also requires a Risk Management Plan if over
that
threshold quantity. If there's no risk to the community if one of
these
batteries leaked, why not exclude it from CRTK reporting if, in fact,
the
batteries meet either definition?
djw
Don Wanamaker
Environmental Management, Ltd.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Clark"
To:
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Emergency Action Plan for science labs
Kathleen,
Most emergency power generators typically don't service the entire
building,
just the critical systems, and those are the ones with the red plugs or
otherwise hard-wired into the building grid. Even that might not
suffice
for your needs, a typical emergency power generator requires 6 or 7
seconds
before it actually restores power. But as we all know, that kind of
power
interruption can disrupt hundreds of sensitive automated laboratory
analyses
that took hours to set up. As Arnold would say: Beeeg Problem (especially
if you have insufficient samples for re-runs!).
That's where the Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) comes in. It's
basically
a bank of several dozen continually-charging car batteries that will
provide
sufficient continuous AC power for 10 - 15 seconds to ultra-critical
systems
until the emergency power generator kicks in. And there are no moving
parts. There are lots of different kinds out there. We happen to use
the
Eaton Powerware 9390 - actually two of them, set up side by side.
One more thing about the UPS. Don't forget to report the lead and
sulfuric
acid on the annual Community Right To Know forms AND tell the local
fire
department about them and show them where they are!
Eric
Eric Clark, MS, CCHO, CHMM
Safety & Compliance Officer
Los Angeles County Public Health Laboratory
>>> "Schmidt-Nebril, Kathleen" 7/8/2010 5:34 PM
>>>
My university recently was hit with a four day power outage due to
severe
storms. Our science building is recently new and has a back up
generator
however none of the main lab instruments or equipment were backed up to
it.
Hoods, lights and ventilation were. In the end we are looking at a
huge
insurance claim and are now trying to prepare an action plan for each
of
our labs in the event we go through something like this again. I am the
CHO
for the department and was asked to put this together. Does anyone
know
what OSHA standard, if any, I should be looking at for this? They want
to
incorporate a "what to do" list for example if none of the scientists
were
around someone from maintenance could follow it to turn off sensitive
equipment in our absence. My thought on that is would we need to train
and
document anyone who might have to respond and use our action list?
Kathleen
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post