Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:51:09 -0500
Reply-To: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: "Amell, Diane (DLI)" <diane.amell**At_Symbol_Here**STATE.MN.US>
Subject: Re: Safety Training
In-Reply-To: <975FA6B99931624499BC3BAD910E4F6FA1854F18**At_Symbol_Here**>

We incorporate safety an d other training into our monthly unit staff meetings. For mandatory training, such as Employee Right-To-Know (the MN version of HAZCOM), we hold one make-up sess ion. If the staff members miss that as well, it becomes a discipline issue. We h ave, however, given a few one-on-one sessions when the absences have been unavoi dable, such as for a fatality investigation or military duty.

- Diane Amell, MNOSHA

From: DCHAS-L Discu ssion List [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**] On Behalf Of Laura Damon
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 5:01 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Safety Training

I am wondering how others address employees “blowing-off” safety training.  There always seem to be th e few employees that invariably are no shows for the trainings.

Thanks in advance for your replies…

Laura Damon

Coordinator of Instructional Safety and Chemical Hygie ne

Flathead Valley Community College


Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.