Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:00:42 -0600
Reply-To: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: Kathy Rusniak <krusniak**At_Symbol_Here**NANOINK.NET>
Subject: Re: NY School
In-Reply-To: A

Rob’s link to the EPA makes a pretty good case for replacing the ballasts.

Full discussion here: http ://

Rob Toreki

  ======================== ========================= =====

Safety Emporium - Lab & Safety Supplies featuring brand names

you know and trust.  Visit us at

esales**At_Symbol_Here**  or toll-free: (866) 326-5412

Fax: (856) 553-6154, PO Box 1003, Blackwood, NJ 08012

Ka thy Rusniak

As sociate Engineer & Safety Coordinator

Na noInk, Inc.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This email contains information from the sender that may be CONFIDENTIAL, LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY or otherwise protected from disclosure. This email is intended for use only by the person or entity to whom it is addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying, distribution, printing, or any action taken in reliance on the contents of this email, is strictly prohibited.

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**] On Behalf Of Debbie M. Decker
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 2:20 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] NY School

And I’m wondering why they were testing for PCBs.  Did a lighting ballast fail?  Why replace all the lighting if it’s all intact and working fine?  Are the elevated PCBs directly attributable to lighting?  There are other sources, principally in caulk.

They probably should retrofit the lighting to energy efficient fixtures and the like, as a matter of good stewardship of their utility dollars.  But I’m with Pat – I think there’s a lot of information missing to go leaping to these types of conclusions.



Debbie Decker

EH&S UCDavis

(530)754-7964/(530)681-1799 (Cell)

FAX (530)752-4527


Co-Conspirator to Make the World A

Better Place -- Visit and join the conspiracy

Birkett's hypothesis: "Any chemical reaction

that proceeds smoothly under normal conditions,

can proceed violently in the presence of an idiot."

From:  Redden, Patricia
Am I crazy thinking this is overkill, that you automatically need a complete lighting retrofit if the school was built after 1979? g-held-to-discuss-s-i-school-chemical-problem/


Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.