Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:37:29 -0500
Reply-To: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: Mary Ellen Abel <mabel**At_Symbol_Here**MORTONSALT.COM>
Subject: Re: MSDS Retention
In-Reply-To: <C3E98B533BBA314490DC0D1C18E023170EFC6D09**At_Symbol_Here**pb01msx.wgipb.local>


Actually we are not an OSHA regulated facility, we are an MSHA regulated 
facility, Mine Safety Health Administration.  Similar rules, not 
identical, but a much different focus.


Mary Ellen Abel
Quality Assurance & Environmental Manager
Morton Salt
P.O. Box 428
Grand River, OH 44045-0428
phone:  440-639-4279
fax:  440-639-4269
cell:  440-479-9022


"Long, Don"  
Sent by: DCHAS-L Discussion List 
02/23/2011 06:21 PM
Please respond to
DCHAS-L Discussion List 

To
DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: [DCHAS-L] MSDS Retention




Ohio falls under the Federal OSHA, so I'm sure that facility is an "OSHA 
regulated" facility.
 
As far as maintaining MSDSs, it's not that difficult to maintain them 
electronically. We are supposed to be in the business of taking care of 
folks. I don't understand the conflict here. We are already required to 
maintain medical records of employees employed more than 1 year for "the 
duration of employment plus 30 years". It stands to reason that the MSDSs 
would follow the same reasoning.
 
I know when the Feds audit us (Army, CDC, OSHA, etc) their response is 
that if it's been used then we better have an MSDS. In the Haz-Com exerpt 
below, it seems to make it clear that we "shall maintain copies of any 
MSDSs that are received with incoming shipments...". 
 
1910.1200(b)(4)(ii) 
"Employers shall maintain copies of any material safety data sheets that 
are received with incoming shipments of the sealed containers of hazardous 
chemicals, shall obtain a material safety data sheet as soon as possible 
for sealed containers of hazardous chemicals received without a material 
safety data sheet if an employee requests the material safety data sheet, 
and shall ensure that the material safety data sheets are readily 
accessible during each work shift to employees when they are in their work 
area(s);" 
Just some thoughts....
 
Don A. Long
CAIH, CEAS I
Southwest Research Institute Laboratory
Pine Bluff Chemical Agent Disposal Facility
PO Box 20130
White Hall, AR 71612
870-541-4930 

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**list.uvm.edu] On Behalf Of 
Mary Ellen Abel
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 10:05 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] MSDS Retention

It is my understanding that the '30 years' refers to the date of the last 
potential exposure, not the data that the MSDS was received.  So that 30 
years might actually be 45 years, if that individual used it for a period 
beyond its first use.  Although I am not in an OSHA regulated facility, we 
have been screening MSDSs for products used in our underground mine long 
before Haz Com was ever developed. 

Mary Ellen Abel
Quality Assurance & Environmental Manager
Morton Salt
P.O. Box 428
Grand River, OH 44045-0428
phone:  440-639-4279
fax:  440-639-4269
cell:  440-479-9022 

"Peifer, Patricia"  
Sent by: DCHAS-L Discussion List  
02/23/2011 09:17 AM 

Please respond to
DCHAS-L Discussion List 


To
DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU 
cc

Subject
[DCHAS-L] MSDS Retention





A debate has come up within our organization concerning the retention of 
MSDSs.  I have been saving old copies of MSDSs for which new revisions 
have been issued.   My understanding is that this would be proof that we 
did have the MSDS on file if an employee claimed twenty years later that 
they were exposed to a chemical and said we did not provide them with 
adequate information.   I planned on keeping them for thirty years.   
  
Others in my organization feel I may be wasting my time.  They feel I 
should be throwing out older versions and only retaining the latest copy 
particularly if the revisions were not significant.   They do agree 
however, that I should be keeping old MSDSs for chemicals for which we 
discontinue use.   
  
Any thoughts?  Thank you, everyone.   
  
Pat Peifer 
Health Safety and Training Team Leader 
West Pharmaceutical Services 
  
  
Find West on Twitter and LinkedIn.

The contents of this message are confidential and may be privileged. If 
you have received this message in error, please permanently delete it, 
along with any files that may be attached to this message, without 
reading, printing, copying, forwarding or otherwise distributing it. 
Please notify the sender of the error immediately so that we can prevent 
it from happening again. 
This e-mail and any attachments contain URS Corporation confidential 
information that may be proprietary or privileged. If you receive this 
message in error or are not the intended recipient, you should not retain, 
distribute, disclose or use any of this information and you should destroy 
the e-mail and any attachments or copies. 


Actually we are not an OSHA regulated facility, we are an MSHA regulated facility, Mine Safety Health Administration.  Similar rules, not identical, but a much different focus.

Mary Ellen Abel
Quality Assurance & Environmental Manager
Morton Salt
P.O. Box 428
Grand River, OH 44045-0428
phone:  440-639-4279
fax:  440-639-4269
cell:  440-479-9022


"Long, Don" <don.long**At_Symbol_Here**WGINT.COM>
Sent by: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**list.uvm.edu>

02/23/2011 06:21 PM
Please respond to
DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**list.uvm.edu>

To
DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: [DCHAS-L] MSDS Retention



Ohio falls under the Federal OSHA, so I'm sure that facility is an "OSHA regulated" facility.
 
As far as maintaining MSDSs, it's not that difficult to maintain them electronically. We are supposed to be in the business of taking care of folks. I don't understand the conflict here. We are already required to maintain medical records of employees employed more than 1 year for "the duration of employment plus 30 years". It stands to reason that the MSDSs would follow the same reasoning.
 
I know when the Feds audit us (Army, CDC, OSHA, etc) their response is that if it's been used then we better have an MSDS. In the Haz-Com exerpt below, it seems to make it clear that we "shall maintain copies of any MSDSs that are received with incoming shipments...".
 

1910.1200(b)(4)(ii)

"Employers shall maintain copies of any material safety data sheets that are received with incoming shipments of the sealed containers of hazardous chemicals, shall obtain a material safety data sheet as soon as possible for sealed containers of hazardous chemicals received without a material safety data sheet if an employee requests the material safety data sheet, and shall ensure that the material safety data sheets are readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they are in their work area(s);"

Just some thoughts....

 

Don A. Long
CAIH, CEAS I
Southwest Research Institute Laboratory
Pine Bluff Chemical Agent Disposal Facility
PO Box 20130
White Hall, AR 71612
870-541-4930



From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**list.uvm.edu] On Behalf Of Mary Ellen Abel
Sent:
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 10:05 AM
To:
DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject:
Re: [DCHAS-L] MSDS Retention



It is my understanding that the '30 years' refers to the date of the last potential exposure, not the data that the MSDS was received.  So that 30 years might actually be 45 years, if that individual used it for a period beyond its first use.  Although I am not in an OSHA regulated facility, we have been screening MSDSs for products used in our underground mine long before Haz Com was ever developed.


Mary Ellen Abel
Quality Assurance & Environmental Manager
Morton Salt
P.O. Box 428
Grand River, OH 44045-0428
phone:  440-639-4279
fax:  440-639-4269
cell:  440-479-9022

"Peifer, Patricia" <Patricia.Peifer**At_Symbol_Here**WESTPHARMA.COM>
Sent by: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**list.uvm.edu>

02/23/2011 09:17 AM
Please respond to
DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**list.uvm.edu>


To
DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU
cc
Subject
[DCHAS-L] MSDS Retention




A debate has come up within our organization concerning the retention of MSDSs.  I have been saving old copies of MSDSs for which new revisions have been issued.   My understanding is that this would be proof that we did have the MSDS on file if an employee claimed twenty years later that they were exposed to a chemical and said we did not provide them with adequate information.   I planned on keeping them for thirty years.  

 
Others in my organization feel I may be wasting my time.  They feel I should be throwing out older versions and only retaining the latest copy particularly if the revisions were not significant.   They do agree however, that I should be keeping old MSDSs for chemicals for which we discontinue use.  

 
Any thoughts?  Thank you, everyone.  

 
Pat Peifer

Health Safety and Training Team Leader

West Pharmaceutical Services

 
 

Find West on Twitter and LinkedIn.


The contents of this message are confidential and may be privileged. If you have received this message in error, please permanently delete it, along with any files that may be attached to this message, without reading, printing, copying, forwarding or otherwise distributing it. Please notify the sender of the error immediately so that we can prevent it from happening again.


This e-mail and any attachments contain URS Corporation confidential information that may be proprietary or privileged. If you receive this message in error or are not the intended recipient, you should not retain, distribute, disclose or use any of this information and you should destroy the e-mail and any attachments or copies.

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.