Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:41:29 EST
Reply-To: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: ACTSNYC**At_Symbol_Here**CS.COM
Subject: Re: MSDS Retention

That might work in chemistry labs where chemicals are single substances for the most part, but not in other workplaces where the products are complex mixtures of stuff.  You'll need all the information on the MSDS to track down manufacturers that are out of business, ingredients whose source is not identified, and other data.

For example, having a list that includes a mineral substances such as talc, clay, titanium dioxide, etc., does not tell you if the talc is from upstate New York mines and contains asbestos, the clay is high in free silica, or the titanium dioxide is from lead-contaminated anastase ores.

My advice is to keep the MSDSs if you are talking mixtures.


In a message dated 2/23/2011 9:01:51 PM Eastern Standard Time, pzavon**At_Symbol_Here**ROCHESTER.RR.COM writes:

There are many good reasons to retain older MSDS, and several have been mentioned in this conversation - but OSHA does not require that.  As noted, any record that identifies the materials used, and when and where used can serve the function required by OSHA.  As part of the Hazard Communication standard you ought to have an annual list of the materials in use by each group. That list should provide the required information.
Peter Zavon, CIH
Penfield, NY


Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.