Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2011 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2011 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: CIH Position - Asbestos and Lead Expertise Preferred

Date: Aug 16, 2011 15:16 UTC

Author: Craig Calvert <CCalvert**At_Symbol_Here**FANDO.COM>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: Definition of "tepid"

Date: Aug 16, 2011 15:53 UTC

Author: Brady Arnold <barnold**At_Symbol_Here**XENOTECHLLC.COM>

Subject context

From: Debbie M. Decker <dmdecker**At_Symbol_Here**UCDAVIS.EDU>

Subject: Definition of "tepid"

Date: Aug 16, 2011 15:26 UTC

Reply-To: DCHAS-L Discussion List

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 

I know we’ve beaten this one to death already but I wasn’t paying attention and now I need the collective brain.  I found ANSI says that “tepid” is between 60 and 100F.  But I seem to recall other advice that suggests this is too wide of a range – 60F is unco mfortably cold and 100F is far too hot for an eyewash.

What do you guys think?

Thanks,

Debbie

-----------------------------------

Debbie M. Decker, Campus Chemical Safety Officer
Environmental Health and Safety
University of California, Davis
1 Shields Ave.
Davis, CA  95616
(530)754-7964/(530)681-1799 (cell)

(530)752-4527 (FAX)
dmdecker**At_Symbol_Here**ucdavis.edu
Co-Conspirator to Make the World A
Better Place -- Visit www.HeroicStories.com and join the conspiracy

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post