About This Archive | DCHAS-L 2011 Index | DCHAS-L Yearly Index | DCHAS-L Home Page
From: Todd Perkins <p3wt3r**At_Symbol_Here**CHARTER.NET>
Subject: Re: boiler plate CHP for small college
Date: Sep 22, 2011 15:27 UTC
Reply-To: Todd Perkins <p3wt3r**At_Symbol_Here**charter.net>
Message-ID: <legacy-2011-20110922i@ilpi.com>
In-Reply-To: <A4BDFFCAC336824B8501F8FA6E1DA2D4AC51F65446**At_Symbol_Here**EXCHMBA.ornl.gov>
Do you mean test the mixture for flammability per CGA publication P-23? My understanding is that the data is based on experimental observation as well as calculation. I've never had reason to question the data. Have you observed something different? Todd Perkins Regional Safet Director Airgas Mid America Thanks, Todd - Sent from my mobile phone On Sep 22, 2011 11:41 AM, Jeskie, Kimberly B. <jeskiekb**At_Symbol_Here**ORNL.GOV> wro te: Has anyone actually tested a 4% hydrogen/ 96% argon mixture using ASTM E-68 1, as opposed to just taking the P-23 data or the Bureau of Mines Bulletin 503-1952 at face value? Kim Kimberly Begley Jeskie, MPH-OSHMOper ations ManagerPhysical Sciences DirectorateOak Ridge National Laboratory(86 5) 574-4945Do you mean test the mixture for flammability per CGA publication P-23? My understanding is that the data is based on experimental observation as well as calculation. I've never had reason to question the data. Have you observed something different?
Todd Perkins
Regional Safet Director
Airgas Mid AmericaThanks,
Todd
- Sent from my mobile phone
On Sep 22, 2011 11:41 AM, Jeskie, Kimberly B. <jeskiekb**At_Symbol_Here**ORNL.GOV> ; wrote:Has any one actually tested a 4% hydrogen/ 96% argon mixture using ASTM E-681, as opposed to just taking the P-23 data or the Bureau of Mines Bulletin 503-1 952 at face value?
Kim
Kimberly Begley Jeskie, MPH-O SHM
Operations Manager Physical Sciences Directorate
Oak Ridge Nat ional Laboratory
(865) 574-4945