From: "Weeks, Robert W Jr" <rweeks**At_Symbol_Here**LANL.GOV>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Cadaver lab ventilation; Dissection tables for 1) cadavers and 2) animals
Date: February 2, 2012 11:27:43 AM EST
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: <CAHoE6jpdyNU9YSDP76vbBCB3-GkK5Cb3Pthp5sM=6Hw_6F507w**At_Symbol_Here**>



The best reason for not going w/the OSHA values is that they are so often incorrect and unsafe. A case in point is the OSHA PEL for beryllium. In September of 1999 OSHA published awareness information stating that the PEL for beryllium was not protective of the American worker. The PEL value at that time was 2.0 micrograms per cubic meter, i.e., the same value as it is today.  The process of getting something changed in OSHA involves not only epidemiological data but also economic factors. When economic factors are considered, changing a PEL can sometimes take decades…yes, decades.  On the other hand, NIOSH can evaluate epidemiological data and establish a value based on the epidemiological data and not be burdened with the economic factors.  For this reason the NIOSH value is generally more up to date and more protective of the American worker than is the OSHA value. In the case of the formaldehyde OELs,0 .75 /0.016 = 46.9, nearly a fifty fold lower concentration using the NIOSH  value. Also, the NIOSH value states that formaldehyde is a carcinogen and OSHA does not give this warning.




From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Ferm, Barret
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 8:32 AM
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Cadaver lab ventilation; Dissection tables for 1) cadavers and 2) animals


I am seeking information regarding ventilation methods for a cadaver laboratory.  In particular, we want to know the best way to achieve low formaldehyde levels, closer to the NIOSH recommended level of 0.016 ppm-TWA.  Also, any specific precedence or references you can share to help me inform/educate the decision makers why it is (or is not) in the institution's best interest to go by the NIOSH  values rather than the OSHA values (0.75 ppm TWA for formaldehyde).
All this is in the context of a renovation and expansion.  Any information on this would be greatly appreciated, including vendors for down-draft tables or other engineering control techniology (reviews, good+bad).   Thanks!

Barry Ferm, CHO & Lab Coordinator, St. Ambrose University, Davenport Iowa, fermbarreta**At_Symbol_Here**

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.