Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2012 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2012 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: [DCHAS-L] silica gel

Date: Jun 28, 2012 08:28 UTC

Author: Ray Mainer <rmainer**At_Symbol_Here**GMAVT.NET>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Lab Safety Discussion List

Date: Jun 28, 2012 09:55 UTC

Author: Todd Perkins <p3wt3r**At_Symbol_Here**CHARTER.NET>

Subject context

From: Ken Simolo <simolo**At_Symbol_Here**CHEM.CHEM.ROCHESTER.EDU>

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] High performance hoods

Date: Jun 28, 2012 09:37 UTC

Reply-To: DCHAS-L

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 

We have been using high efficiency hoods very successfully but I agree with everything Dr. Haugen has said.  In our installations, we have taken all of those factors into account so they have worked well.  A lab is a complete system.  A well designed energy efficient lab works better than a poorly designed conventional lab.  To a first approximation, in a properly designed system, a high efficiency hood and a conventional hood are both safe.  

Ken


On Jun 27, 2012, at 8:13 PM, Robert Haugen wrote:

As you note, Ralph, most issues are not related to hood containment if face velocities are properly set per manufacturers' and end users' recommendations.
 
Some more relevant issues are:
 
1)  Air changes in lab.  Unless special detection and flushing technology is present, a small number of HE hoods in a lab may not produce enough air changes to promptly clear a lab proper from accidental spill vapors.  Also, lab thermostatic and humidity control may become issues.
 
2)  Low lab air changes may also produce an excessive thermal gradient from ceiling to floor.
 
3)  Errors in setting hood flows become more significant when nominal flow is a lower number. 
+ 10 FPM is fairly inoccuous at 100 FPM (+10%), but downright serious at 60 FPM (+18%).
 
4)  Solvents tend not to be problems as long as duct concentrations can never exceed 10% of the LEL.
 
I have had other experiences with HE hoods and would be glad to elaborate for any members wishing more detail.
 
Dr. Bob Haugen

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post