Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2012 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2012 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Fire Extinguisher placements

Date: Dec 18, 2012 01:46 UTC

Author: Eric Clark <erclark**At_Symbol_Here**PH.LACOUNTY.GOV>

Next by Date

Subject: [DCHAS-L] Now Available - ACS Presentations on Demand!

Date: Dec 18, 2012 02:21 UTC

Author: Secretary, ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <secretary**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG>

Subject context

From: ACTSNYC**At_Symbol_Here**CS.COM

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Update on theatrical blood bath

Date: Dec 18, 2012 02:03 UTC

Reply-To: DCHAS-L

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 

Good thinking.  If the CDC says the lower temps will work and people will be safe, that's the next issue to look at.  Otherwise, I'll recommend the union pull the plug.  Monona


In a message dated 12/18/2012 2:00:37 PM Eastern Standard Time, kls_1**At_Symbol_Here**COX.NET writes:

I have no idea, but I was just thinking about the wear and tear of the system.  Are the tubing and pumps rated for transfer at 90 degrees?  Are they susceptible to break-down at those temps?  These may or may not be issues, but I was thinking it would be best to find out before showtime.

Karen

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post