From: DE TAVERNIER Stefaan <Stefaan.DETAVERNIER**At_Symbol_Here**EGIS.FR>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Help with terminology
Date: June 27, 2013 7:45:00 AM EDT
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: A<001501ce7298$a1e9c290$e5bd47b0$**At_Symbol_Here**net>

In France, we would call them a "temoin" or a "witness". These persons can play a very important role in commenting the causes of an incident or even of a near miss that has injured one of his workplace colleagues or just failed not to do so.

Best regards

Stefaan De Tavernier

Egis Waste Management
Expert Sites Contamine´s et EHS Due Diligence

10 Rue Nungesser et Coli - ae´roport Nantes Atlantique - 44860 Saint-Aignan-de-Grandlieu
Te´l. : / Port. :
Fax :
Adresse courriel : stefaan.detavernier**At_Symbol_Here**
? Afin de contribuer au respect de l'environnement, merci de n'imprimer ce mail qu'en cas de ne´cessite´

-----Message d'origine-----
De : DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] De la part de Laurence Doemeny
Envoye´ : mercredi 26 juin 2013 20:12
Objet : Re: [DCHAS-L] Help with terminology

I would call them who they are: a student, a researcher, an instructor, a professor, an maintenance worker, etc. If there are people hurt in the incident they are injured. Others are witnesses or simply other occupants.
Each situation may call for identifying the class/occupation of the people involved. By doing this a database is created to evaluate the class/occupation most associated with the lesson learned review process.

-----Original Message-----
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Ralph B. Stuart
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 5:32 AM
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Help with terminology

As part of our incident review process, we are developing a "lessons learned" review process designed to encapsulate key points of either prevention or response to lab incidents that may apply in other laboratory settings on campus. An ongoing challenge I've faced is what to call the person who is more directly involved in the incident. Sometimes they are hurt as a consequence of the incident, sometimes not, but calling them the "victim" seems to prejudice the questions we want to ask about the event.
Have other people come up with terms to describe the people who are at the scene of an incident and may or may not be involved in the cause of the incident?

Thanks for any help with this.

- Ralph

Ralph Stuart CIH
Chemical Hygiene Officer
Department of Environmental Health and Safety Cornell University


Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.