From: "Reinhardt, Peter" <peter.reinhardt**At_Symbol_Here**YALE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] GHS and chemical storage
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:59:19 +0000
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: 56CFF4AEBF5BC544A444B45BDB588A780DC5A97D**At_Symbol_Here**
In-Reply-To <34A942B15A329D46820651CB2BA02CAD44AAC9B4**At_Symbol_Here**EXMBX2.wit.private>

The most recent edition of “Prudent Practices in the Laboratory” refers to Stanford University’s ChemTracker storage system as a good compatible storage group classification system. The CD that accompanies the book includes lists of chemicals that are each storage group. The lists are rather short, but they can help guide you if you don’t use ChemTracker.




Peter A. Reinhardt

Director, Office of Environmental Health & Safety

Yale University

135 College St., Suite 100

New Haven, CT   06510-2411

(203) 737-2123





From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Casparian, Armen
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] GHS and chemical storage


Hi Carole,


This issue came up for me recently in a consulting assignment I had, and no one gave me a good answer.  Many chemicals belong in more than one hazard category (I believe there are nine total) and no one has indicated an order priority in how it is to be listed.  Maybe there isn’t an order and the user has to be aware that the chemical has multiple, simultaneous hazards.  Any further thoughts or references on this matter you would care to share would be greatly appreciated.  





Armen S. Casparian

Professor, Dept. of Sciences

Wentworth Institute of Technology

Boston, MA 02115


Mobile Home of “The Law of Unintended Consequences.”


Law of Unknown Origin: “There will always be more questions than answers.”


From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Herriott, Carole
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] GHS and chemical storage


What about multiple symbols? Which take precedence?




Carole Herriott

EH&S Technician - Hazardous Waste Coordinator

Weyerhaeuser Technology Center




From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Margaret Rakas
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 12:38 PM
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] GHS and chemical storage


Well, then there's the  flammable symbol... 70% ethanol is going to be flammable, still, but isn't pyrophoric.  In an organic chem lab, I would store pyrophorics separately from 70% ethanol, but the GHS symbol is the same...


On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Ralph B. Stuart <rstuart**At_Symbol_Here**> wrote:

> The only problem is for the corrosive class, that contains acids and bases. So you can not rely completely on GHS for storage, as these products are not compatible.


Good point; I thought of that after I sent the e-mail.. I wonder if there are other examples of incompatibilities within GHS classes (for example, explosives?).


- Ralph



Ralph Stuart CIH

Chemical Hygiene Officer

Department of Environmental Health and Safety

Cornell University





Margaret A. Rakas, Ph.D.
Manager, Inventory & Regulatory Affairs
Clark Science Center
413-585-3877 (p)

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.