From: Peter Zavon <pzavon**At_Symbol_Here**>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Judge denies three Harran defense motions
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 21:54:48 -0400
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: 006c01cea45a$be9cc4c0$3bd64e40$**At_Symbol_Here**

Yes, California went farther than most other jurisdictions in terms of what
the law said could be subject to criminal prosecution. Anyone remember the
phrase "be a manager, go to jail"? That was in reference to the California

Peter Zavon, CIH
Penfield, NY


-----Original Message-----
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of
Lee Latimer
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Judge denies three Harran defense motions

I was taught that in California supervisors are liable for the safety
behavior of their reports. I had all our managers and supervisors take a
class whose main point was that fact. It got some of their attention.

Not mentioned in much of this and the changes since is the huge need to
document training, even if it is done one on one in front of a hood by a
more senior member of the lab. This is one of the issues in the case, i.e.
The absence of training records.


Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.