From: "Secretary, ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety" <secretary**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG>
Subject: [DCHAS-L] C&EN Safety Zone blog: What’s that ‘bright orange’ chemical?
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 05:20:59 -0800
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: 9A5579E6-933B-455D-AE9C-14D5C7C719D2**At_Symbol_Here**

Interesting question for the list to consider...

- Ralph

Begin forwarded message:
New post on The Safety Zone

What?s that ?bright orange? chemical?
by Jyllian Kemsley asked See Arr Oh last week, regarding Carol Anne Bond's case before the Supreme Court. Bond tried to poison her husband's mistress. For her efforts, she wound up convicted of violating the Chemical Weapons Convention(*). NPR seems to have caught See Arr Oh's attention with this:

Bond stole toxic chemicals from the chemical manufacturing company where she worked and ordered other chemicals over the Internet. She combined the chemicals into a compound that is potentially lethal in small amounts ? and is also bright orange. Bond spread the toxic material on her rival's mail, mailbox, front doorknob, car door and other surfaces.

But because of the orange color, the mistress, Myrlinda Haynes, easily spotted the chemicals and avoided any injury except a thumb burn.

See Arr Oh then went hunting through the SCOTUS brief to see what Bond actually used:

She purchased some potassium dichromate (a chemical commonly used in printing photographs) from, and stole a bottle of 10, 10-chloro-10-H-phenoxarsine (an arsenic-based chemical) from her employer. Petitioner knew the chemicals were irritants and believed that, if Haynes touched them, she would develop an uncomfortable rash.

But our intrepid blogger still has a question:

What I haven't been able to figure out from the stories or briefings is whether she intended the combination of two potentially poisonous, irritant substances to function apart, or to perform some sort of solid-phase oxidation to, for example, phenoxarsine oxide (a known antimicrobial compound).

Thoughts, anyone?

(*) Whether the case is an appropriate use of the Chemical Weapons Convention is why the case is before the Supreme Court.

Jyllian Kemsley | November 14, 2013 at 9:00 am | URL:

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.