From: JAKSAFETY**At_Symbol_Here**AOL.COM
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] DCHAS-L Digest - 17 Mar 2014 to 18 Mar 2014 (#2014-67)
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 11:24:15 -0400
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: 2ebd5.62dece6.405b109f**At_Symbol_Here**aol.com
Demystify:
Richard,
Filtered Fume Hood like the GreenFumeHoods from Erlab (www.erlab.com) can be an excellent alternative
to ducted fume hoods. Proprietary filter materials a designed for 99% of
all lab chemicals. High Energy Savings.
Rochester University and Butler University each installed 12 hoods for
their organic labs. Jo Wagner at Butler tells me they are very
pleased.
Regards, ... Jim
James A.
Kaufman, Ph.D.
In a message dated 3/19/2014 12:00:56 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
LISTSERV**At_Symbol_Here**listserv.med.cornell.edu writes:
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 18:59:07 -0400 From:
"Richard W. Denton" <rwdenton3**At_Symbol_Here**GMAIL.COM> Subject: Ductless
fumehoods or Not.
Hi everyone: I was asked by my
department to assist in deciding whether to purchase ductless fumehoods
for our undergraduate chemistry labs. We are planning to use these for
flammable solvents, and reactions involving HCl and NaOH. These
hoods will be used by undergraduates for research also. Any input on the
safety issues involved with these equipments versus the regular hoods would be
appreciated. -Richard
(CHO)
The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org. The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.
