From: JAKSAFETY**At_Symbol_Here**AOL.COM
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] DCHAS-L Digest - 17 Mar 2014 to 18 Mar 2014 (#2014-67)
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 11:24:15 -0400
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: 2ebd5.62dece6.405b109f**At_Symbol_Here**

Filtered Fume Hood like the GreenFumeHoods from Erlab ( can be an excellent alternative to ducted fume hoods.  Proprietary filter materials a designed for 99% of all lab chemicals.  High Energy Savings.
Rochester University and Butler University each installed 12 hoods for their organic labs.  Jo Wagner at Butler tells me they are very pleased.
Regards, ... Jim
James A. Kaufman, Ph.D.

In a message dated 3/19/2014 12:00:56 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, LISTSERV**At_Symbol_Here** writes:
Date:    Tue, 18 Mar 2014 18:59:07 -0400
From:    "Richard W. Denton" <rwdenton3**At_Symbol_Here**GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Ductless fumehoods or Not.

Hi everyone:
   I was asked by my department to assist in deciding whether to purchase ductless fumehoods  for our undergraduate chemistry labs. We are planning to use these for flammable solvents, and reactions involving  HCl and NaOH.  These hoods will be used by undergraduates for research also.  Any input on the safety issues involved with these equipments versus the regular hoods would be appreciated.
-Richard (CHO)

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.