From: Slawomir Janicki <slawomir.janicki**At_Symbol_Here**COMCAST.NET>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Conflict Minerals
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 16:19:00 -0400
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: 009501cf58e7$f0dd2c30$d2978490$**At_Symbol_Here**
In-Reply-To <20140415.081433.25496.0**At_Symbol_Here**>

I came across this news just a few minutes ago:

WASHINGTON (AP) — A U.S. appeals court has overturned a disclosure requirement that public companies must post information about their use of minerals from Congo, where militias linked to atrocities have profited from mining minerals used in electronics, jewelry and other goods.

The appeals court says the requirement violates the constitutional free speech rights of companies that must inform the Securities and Exchange Commission and publicize on their websites that any of their products have not been found to be free of mineral conflicts.[…]

This issue is probably going up to the Supreme Court. I would check with lawyers whether compliance is still required as the ruling was not stayed.


Slawomir Janicki, Ph.D.


From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of paracelcusbombastusvon**At_Symbol_Here**
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 9:15 AM
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Conflict Minerals


The Dodd-Frank legislation is primarily a financial and securities regulation but one section addresses the use and sourcing of gold, tin, tantalum, and tungsten from areas of conflict primarily the Congo.  If a company is publicly traded it must report to the SEC its sourcing of these elements.  This includes a downstream investigation of its suppliers, their suppliers, etc including refineries and mine sources.  If a company is privately held it does not have to comply but maybe requested to by customers who have to comply with Dodd-Frank.

Lynn Knudtson

---------- Original Message ----------
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Conflict Minerals
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 13:22:49 -0700

I am looking for someone with high level expertise in the Dodd-Frank Conflict Minerals area; particularly in supply chain management and QA/QC issues


If you are the person or know someone, please ping me off this list






The information contained in this message is privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.


ACSafety has a new address:



PO Box 152329


011(619) 990-4908 (phone, 24/7)


We no longer support FAX.


 Please contact me before sending any packages or courier delivery.  The address for those items is:

5340 Caminito Cachorro

San Diego CA 92105



Fast, Secure, NetZero 4G Mobile Broadband. Try it.

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.