From: "Romano, Joe P" <JRomano**At_Symbol_Here**BEAUTYAVENUES.COM>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] 4.5 year hazmat stats
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 13:14:05 +0000
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: 860C6A33496B1C44A26EC5E576EDC3157A32AB4C**At_Symbol_Here**
In-Reply-To <7FF547B0-AC75-4E1B-AC40-637551DC2147**At_Symbol_Here**>

Dr. Stuart,

Thanks for sharing this interesting information.   Can you tell me if you are tracking just U.S. type hazmat headlines or global (as best you can)?  Thanks.  Joe



Joseph Romano

Technical Director Chemical Compliance Management

PLEASE NOTE: My email address has changed to jromano**At_Symbol_Here**


office 614-856-6174

iphone  614-477-6851


Thought of the week! Life solves its problems with well-adapted designs, life-friendly chemistry and smart material and energy use.  Janine Benyus


From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Secretary, ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 11:06 AM
Subject: [DCHAS-L] 4.5 year hazmat stats


Out of curiosity this morning, and to prepare for a SF National Meeting presentation, I did a quick sanity check of the data trends in the Hazmat headlines I've been collecting since 2010. The numbers are generally consistent with those I reported in 2011 and 2012, which is the last time I carefully cleaned up data inconsistencies before generating the numbers. In case other people are interested in the overall numbers since 2010, they are listed below. The "Total included of reported" indicates the percentage of incidents which had expected data in the right locations; the early days of the system had more inconsistency than today's semi-automated system.


One trend that I notice is that there are a lot more "follow up" stories included in the press, particularly those related to the UCLA fire, the West Virginia leak and the Wes, Texas ammonium nitrate explosion. Meth lab reports seem to have decreased somewhat.


Time period: 4.5 years; 1611 days; 230 weeks; 

Number of hazmat events included:
7780 total events (5/day); 938 lab events (4/week)

Geographic distribution: 74% reported in US

industrial         29%
public  22%
transportation  13%
laboratory        10%
education        4%
Total included of reported 78%

Type distribution:
release 32%
explosion         15%
fire       15%
follow-up        8%
discovery         7%
Total included of reported 77%

Lab event type:
release 40%
fire       17%
explosion         15%
follow-up        13%
discovery         8%
Total included of reported: 93%

Event Extent:
response          47%
injury   24%
environmental 6%
death   6%
follow-up        3%
Total included of reported events: 86%

Chemicals involved are generally unclear: 

15% unknown; 

3% each of the usuals (chlorine, ammonia, petroleum, meth labs, etc.)

The rest less than 1%


Let me know if you have any questions about this.


- Ralph


Ralph Stuart



Division of Chemical Health and Safety

American Chemical Society



Click here to report this email as spam.

Notice: This communication may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by email, and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing them. LB may, for any reason, intercept, access, use, and disclose any information that is communicated by or through, or which is stored on, its networks, applications, services, and devices.

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.