From: "Olinger, Patricia L" <patty.olinger**At_Symbol_Here**EMORY.EDU>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] "labcandy"
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 03:01:47 +0000
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: 23E6AE4E-F609-4302-A0B5-A5ADA904D4AE**At_Symbol_Here**
In-Reply-To <004701cfb5d1$e5c72660$b1557320$**At_Symbol_Here**>

I guess I really don't understand.   They are wearing safety gear and enjoying it.  I think it is sad that today, we are saying that this is demeaning.  It obviously is not demeaning to them.  I see it as their ability to be scientist and yet be able to express themselves instead of being told that they must conform.  Are we telling them that to be a scientist we must be "one of the boys"?  I would have hoped by now we were past this.  

I hated lab coats when I was in the lab.  Being 5'10" and thin, they never fit!  To have a lab coat long enough the arms were always to long and I had to roll up the sleeves and the waist was hugh!  I had a couple tailored.

Recently at the CSHEMA conference one of the vendors had their new line of lab coats.  Tailored for women and they came in colors.  They looked very professional and best of all they fit.  They even had a maternity lab coat.  It is about time.


Sent from my iPad

On Aug 11, 2014, at 10:28 PM, "Mary Ellen Starodub" <mestarodub**At_Symbol_Here**COGECO.CA> wrote:

Science is cool!!!! That’s a fact. It’s interesting and creative … and fun!

Science transcends and underpins pretty much everything ….. travel, art & design, music, textiles and clothing, jewellery, architecture, construction, plumbing, electricity, health, cooking, ….

Try to imagine life and where would we be without it…..



From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Katherine Wall
Sent: August-11-14 10:27 AM
Subject: [DCHAS-L] "labcandy"


I've been thinking about this all weekend. I believe strongly that 'we' need to do more to get the girls' attention about being scientists. And the lab coats and safety goggles bling is great. But the name "labcandy" is too close to "eye candy", in my humble opinion. All girls / young women (and I am the mother of one and used to be one!) want to be "eye candy". So, are we trying to get girls into science so the guys have something better to look at than the old nerd in the white lab coat? I agree with Monona, this is demeaning for the girls. Can't we interest them in science because that's what the world/earth/people/food/etc. is based on?



Thanks for reading my two cents.


Kathy Wall, M.S.
Chemistry Lab Coordinator

Chemistry Adjunct Faculty
Direct 630-466-2347

Office SCI 204

Division of Mathematics and Sciences
Waubonsee Community College
Rt 47 at Waubonsee Dr.
Sugar Grove, IL 60554



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This message, including any attachment(s), is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the Technical Assistance Center immediately by telephone at 630-466-4357 and then delete the message from your system. Thank you.

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.