From: "Murphy, Dr. Ruth Ann" <rmurphy**At_Symbol_Here**UMHB.EDU>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] "labcandy" -source of coats
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 20:50:22 +0000
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: 4D0A3882C09D2E42BE7C6B7265CB0D5F01230721E2**At_Symbol_Here**
In-Reply-To <03048E312CBED348AFF78982D3A75A654126E395**At_Symbol_Here**>

Really?  I was told Quincy closedL and we ordered from someone else.


Ruth Ann



Ruth Ann Murphy, Ph.D.

Professor of Chemistry

Chairperson, Department of Chemistry, Environmental Science and Geology

Co-Chairperson, Health Professions Advisory Committee

Amy LeVesconte Professorship of Chemistry

JAMP Faculty Director

The University of Mary Hardin-Baylor

900 College Street

Belton, TX  76513-2599

Phone 254.295.4542










From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU]On Behalf Of Richard W. York
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 10:05 AM
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] "labcandy" -source of coats


We have been using coats from Quincy Specialties. They provide a choice of fabrics and basic colors and have both men's and women's styles.  Our women seem comfortable with them.  We were even able to buy a child size for one very small woman.  


It appears that stocks their coats.  We have always ordered direct from Quincy.


Richard York

Coordinator of Chemistry Labs

Wittenberg University



From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU]On Behalf Of Margaret Rakas
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] "labcandy"


I would love to have the information re: women's lab coat vendors.  We have switched to offering 100% cotton labcoats and it is quite difficult to find those in colors (although I'm all for colored coats), much less in women's sizing.


many thanks!


On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Bethicia Prasek <bprasek**At_Symbol_Here**> wrote:

I was so glad when we had the opportunity to order women's lab coats at my work. The men's coats didn't fit well, had long sleeves which got in the way or had to be rolled up, and felt bulky. Due to good fit, women's lab coats are safer for women to wear.


Science for men and women is not about looking good, but I have no issue with making it "fun". I would prefer if the fun options were marketed to both boys and girls. Thankfully, there are lab coat options out there for professional scientists which suit a woman's shape and are more "fashionable". I do not order these coats so do not have immediately available ordering information, but I do know we can get coats which fit women well in standard lab coats and those manufactured flame resistant. I could ask for ordering information if you are interested.


I don't think a lab coat needs to be gender-neutral. It just needs to fit well, be professional, and protect the wearer.


Bethicia Prasek


From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU]On Behalf Of S deBoer
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] "labcandy"


Until this thread started I had never even thought of labcoats being "men's" clothing, it was just a labcoat.  Now I know better, I guess I should probably feel bad about being a woman wearing "men's" clothes(?)

I'm all for making labcoats and safety gear more fun and appealing, but personally, the gender nonsense is a bit old and sickening. Why can't fun-coloured coats be marketed to both genders? 


This is annoying in the same way that pink lego is annoying.  

Both are sold under the banner of "empowerment", but when you really think about it, do you really love the message?


My two cents- from a chemist working on a minesite.  

P.S. i would totally buy one of these colourful coats if it was gender-neutral and didn't say 'Lab Candy' on it.


Susan deBoer, 

QA/QC Specialist






On Tuesday, August 12, 2014, Katherine Wall <kwall**At_Symbol_Here**> wrote:

I've been thinking about this all weekend. I believe strongly that 'we' need to do more to get the girls' attention about being scientists. And the lab coats and safety goggles bling is great. But the name "labcandy" is too close to "eye candy", in my humble opinion. All girls / young women (and I am the mother of one and used to be one!) want to be "eye candy". So, are we trying to get girls into science so the guys have something better to look at than the old nerd in the white lab coat? I agree with Monona, this is demeaning for the girls. Can't we interest them in science because that's what the world/earth/people/food/etc. is based on?



Thanks for reading my two cents.


Kathy Wall, M.S.
Chemistry Lab Coordinator

Chemistry Adjunct Faculty
Direct 630-466-2347

Office SCI 204

Division of Mathematics and Sciences
Waubonsee Community College
Rt 47 at Waubonsee Dr.
Sugar Grove, IL 60554



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This message, including any attachment(s), is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the Technical Assistance Center immediately by telephone at630-466-4357 and then delete the message from your system. Thank you.


Margaret A. Rakas, Ph.D.
Manager, Inventory & Regulatory Affairs
Clark Science Center
413-585-3877 (p)

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.