From:
Monona Rossol <actsnyc**At_Symbol_Here**cs.com>
Subject:
Re: [DCHAS-L] Interesting TSCA Issue
Date:
Nov 6, 2015 22:11 UTC
Reply-To:
DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
In-Reply-To:
The consumables for the printer are very often OSHA items and should have SDSs on file. And there are already some studies of the nanoparticles and other good stuff coming off the various processes used. While the worst are the powder printers, the ABS plastic string type are no day at the beach either in terms of emissions. We want them vented.
Monona Rossol, M.S., M.F.A., Industrial Hygienist
President: Arts, Crafts & Theater Safety, Inc.
Safety Officer: Local USA829, IATSE
181 Thompson St., #23
New York, NY 10012 212-777-0062
-----Original Message-----
From: Frankie Wood-Black <fwblack**At_Symbol_Here**CABLEONE.NET>
To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Sent: Fri, Nov 6, 2015 4:21 pm
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Interesting TSCA Issue
http://www.tcetoday.com/latest%20news/2015/november/3d-printed-objects-kill-fish.aspx#.Vj0V37erTcs
Here is an interesting TSCA issue - the product of the printer is an object and therefore wouldn't be a TSCA applicable item. However, there was a similar issue with carbonless paper when it first came out and that was determined to be a chemical under TSCA. So - let the discussion begin.
--
Frankie Wood-Black, Ph.D., REM, MBA
Principal - Sophic Pursuits
6855 Lake Road
Ponca City, OK 74604
580-761-3703
