From: Monona Rossol <actsnyc**At_Symbol_Here**>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Interesting TSCA Issue
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 17:11:31 -0500
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: 150dedac776-433-24d4**At_Symbol_Here**
In-Reply-To <30740296.161491947.1446844060599.JavaMail.zimbra**At_Symbol_Here**>

The consumables for the printer are very often OSHA items and should have SDSs on file.  And there are already some studies of the nanoparticles and other good stuff coming off the various processes used.  While the worst are the powder printers, the ABS plastic string type are no day at the beach either in terms of emissions.  We want them vented.

Monona Rossol, M.S., M.F.A., Industrial Hygienist
President:  Arts, Crafts & Theater Safety, Inc.
Safety Officer: Local USA829, IATSE
181 Thompson St., #23
New York, NY 10012     212-777-0062


-----Original Message-----
From: Frankie Wood-Black <fwblack**At_Symbol_Here**CABLEONE.NET>
Sent: Fri, Nov 6, 2015 4:21 pm
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Interesting TSCA Issue

Here is an interesting TSCA issue - the product of the printer is an object and therefore wouldn't be a TSCA applicable item.  However, there was a similar issue with carbonless paper when it first came out and that was determined to be a chemical under TSCA.   So - let the discussion begin.

Frankie Wood-Black, Ph.D., REM, MBA
Principal - Sophic Pursuits
6855 Lake Road
Ponca City, OK 74604

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.