From: "Schmidt, Diane (schmidd)" <schmidd**At_Symbol_Here**UCMAIL.UC.EDU>
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Follow-up on ACS national awards anf Fellows program RE: [DCHAS-L] Just published
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 03:35:57 +0000
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: C8A73C8B760C4B4095C7B3DC49D4142025ABD528**At_Symbol_Here**

Dear CHAS colleagues,


Our current national awards nominations process uses the following statement: "To the best of my knowledge, the nominee employs and requires good safety protocols and practices in his/her laboratory." The nominator must select "yes", "no" or "Unknown".


At our meeting this week,  the ACS Board began the process of adding safety to the ACS Fellows criteria, and adding clauses to the ACS national awards and Fellows program that allows ACS to revoke an award or Fellows designation. I expect that these provisions will be put in place shortly.


Best regards,


Diane G. Schmidt

ACS President

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**] on behalf of Bruce Van Scoy [bvanscoy**At_Symbol_Here**TWC.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Just published

Thanks Neal!

I his AAAS Fellowship should absolutely be revoked.  But, I continue to question, what was she trained in, to what standards and what were our responsibilities to see that she was adequately protected?  Dr. Harran was receiving the award based upon "The association bestows this honorary title on members "whose efforts on behalf of the advancement of science or its applications are scientifically or socially distinguished," according to the AAAS website. Nominated by people in their own disciplines, 347 fellows were chosen this year."  Upholding safety principals is not mentioned, I hypothesize that the very fact he was nominated by peers from his profession, is an indicator of how far we still have yet to travel with our responsibilities to ensure they are fully informed and accountable.  We've come a long way, but serious laboratory accidents continue to occur.  Maybe a correct analogy is to consider we may be 20' up on a 40' ladder and still have a long way to go.  Are our efforts being successful?  If not, why not?  Finally, how can we expedite the process to achieve higher impact/results?  I have asked a lot of questions, that we will probably never obtain specific answers to.  But shouldn't we be asking these questions?



From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**] On Behalf Of NEAL LANGERMAN
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 2:14 PM
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Just published


The following was just published … on the AAAS story






The information contained in this message is privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.


ACSafety has a new address:



PO Box 152329


011(619) 990-4908 (phone, 24/7)


We no longer support FAX.


 Please contact me before sending any packages or courier delivery.  The address for those items is:

5340 Caminito Cachorro

San Diego CA 92105



Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.