From: Monona Rossol <actsnyc**At_Symbol_Here**>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Standard Chemical Fume Hood Face Velocities
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:02:07 -0400
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: 1542e9d1517-4cb0-45e5**At_Symbol_Here**

I'm so jealous I can hardly stand it.  I want 125 f/m because I know that no artist, when no one is looking, will allow a piece of glass between them and the bubbling acid etch or whatever else they are doing in the hood.  At least with 125 there will be some ventilation while the sash is up above their heads and their heads are in the hood over the baths.

Monona Rossol, M.S., M.F.A., Industrial Hygienist
President:  Arts, Crafts & Theater Safety, Inc.
Safety Officer: Local USA829, IATSE
181 Thompson St., #23
New York, NY 10012     212-777-0062


-----Original Message-----
From: Louis DiBerardinis <loudib**At_Symbol_Here**MIT.EDU>
Sent: Tue, Apr 19, 2016 7:10 am
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Standard Chemical Fume Hood Face Velocities

Ditto. Could not have said it better. See :   for more info on lab ventilation.
Lou DiBerardinis, CIH, CSP
Director, EHS Office
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**] On Behalf Of Debbie M. Decker
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 8:31 PM
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Standard Chemical Fume Hood Face Velocities
Oooo - I'm all atwitter - a fume hood question!
In California, 100 fpm is the minimum average face velocity with no point less than 70 fpm (8CCR5154.1).  Modern well-engineered fume hoods contain just dandy at 80 to 120 fpm.  Over about 125 fpm, there's too much turbulence for good capture and less than 80 fpm doesn't contain well, either.  At my campus, we've standardized on vertical-rising sashes and 100 fpm at an 18" sash height.
Hope this helps,
Debbie M. Decker, CCHO, ACS Fellow
Immediate Past Chair, Division of Chemical Health and Safety
University of California, Davis
Birkett's hypothesis: "Any chemical reaction
that proceeds smoothly under normal conditions,
can proceed violently in the presence of an idiot."
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Chance, Brandon
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 2:32 PM
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Standard Chemical Fume Hood Face Velocities
By a quick show of hands, what face velocity do all of you consider as an acceptable velocity for certifying standard chemical fume hoods in academic and research labs?  OSHA is pretty vague on the issue (must provide adequate ventilation [1910.1450(e)(3)(iii)]).  Appendix A (non-mandatory) references Prudent Practices, where 80-100 is standard, up to 120 is okay for high hazard (no containment benefit proven) and 60fpm may be okay for low flow, specially designed hoods.  
Before getting into too much detail, I am curious as to what all of you are considering as passing at 18in sash height, and what you are considering as failing.
Brandon S. Chance, M.S., CCHO
Associate Director of Environmental Health and Safety
Office of Risk Management
Southern Methodist University 
PO Box 750231 | Dallas, TX  75275-0231
T) 214.768.2430 | M) 469-978-8664
"- our job in safety is to make the task happen, SAFELY; not to interfere with the work-" Neal Langerman

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.