Although not in the realm of dye chemistry, an excellent book on the state of industrial product versus the discounting of the employee is the The Radium Girls: The Dark Story of America's Shining Women by Kate Moore. Total disregard of worker safety no matter what level, professional, hourly, etc.If you look at photos from Eastman Kodak labs in the 1930's it appears that safety was not high on the list of must-do.Good luck.Jim Duncan, PhdSenior Consulting ScientistRJ Lee Group, Inc.--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional secretary at secretary**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchasOn Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 6:36 AM, Monona Rossol <0000030664c37427-dmarc-
request**At_Symbol_Here**lists.princeton.edu> wrote:And in 1936, the primary cancer may not have arisen in the liver. Research also the status of cancer research in 1936 to examine the assumption that the cancer was actually liver cancer.
Monona Rossol, M.S., M.F.A., Industrial HygienistPresident: Arts, Crafts & Theater Safety, Inc.Safety Officer: Local USA829, IATSE181 Thompson St., #23New York, NY 10012 212-777-0062
From: Zack Mansdorf <mansdorfz**At_Symbol_Here**BELLSOUTH.NET>
To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU>
Sent: Fri, Jun 9, 2017 7:04 pmSubject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Common industrial lab safety practices 1906-1930?
--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional secretary at secretary**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchasAzo dyes and other chemicals used for various purposes in the textile industries have long been linked to excesses in cancer (although liver cancer is not predominate). There is a study from IARC (http://www.inchem.org/documen
ts/iarc/vol48/48-13.html) from 1990 that provides a bit of information. My suspicion is that it was more than just lab safety that may have had an effect on your relative. I would guess (but do not know) that the factory workers were at greater risk than the lab workers.I am sure some others can share their understanding.ZackS.Z. Mansdorf, PhD, CIH, CSP, QEPConsultant in EHS and Sustainability7184 Via PalomarBoca Raton, FL 33433Colleagues,With the wisdom of this listserve, I bet a few of you may provide some information on this topic.A family member is writing a history of a relative who was a Harvard-educated dye chemist at a New England textile firm from 1906 until about 1930. At that time his health began to deteriorate and he "retired" from chemistry. He died in 1936 of liver cancer at 51 years of age.Both she and I know it is highly speculative to associate his work and poor health, but she wonders what laboratory safety precautions might have been in common industrial use during that time. Do you know?When I worked at the University of Wisconsin, a retired chemistry professor there told me that his first "gas mask" was purchased from army surplus prior to WW II. In my career, I've helped remodel labs with functional fume hoods dating from the 1920s. Were masks, gloves, hoods, etc. in common use in industrial labs between 1906 and 1930?Perhaps there is a book that traces this safety history. If so, I'd appreciate hearing about itThank you!PetePeter A. ReinhardtDirector, Office of Environmental Health & SafetyYale University135 College St., Suite 100New Haven, CT 06510-2411
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post