DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive
From: TILAK CHANDRA <0000058f112ac338-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Scientist says some pollution is good for you Ñ a disputed claim TrumpÕs EPA has embraced
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 03:15:50 +0000
Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU>
Message-ID: DM5PR0601MB37841B72ABBB59E42DC2F708887E0**At_Symbol_Here**DM5PR0601MB3784.namprd06.prod.outlook.com
In-Reply-To
Thank you Rob!
To verify the actual toxicity of various pollutants/particulates, we need to have the data on human clinical trials, not on other species.. According to recent UNO report, 4.2 million deaths occur
each year due to air pollution. Also, how we are going to measure low and high pollution.
This will be a good puzzle for Dr. Alan Hall, a toxicologist to interpret reported toxicological data published in peer review journals about some pollution
is good for humans.
Tilak
From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU> on behalf of ILPI Support <info**At_Symbol_Here**ILPI.COM>
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 6:03:40 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Scientist says some pollution is good for you =97 a disputed claim Trump's EPA has embraced
The title of this LA Times article speaks for itself. Interesting to hear what "mainstream" toxicologists have to say on this.
Rob Toreki
======================================================
Safety Emporium - Lab & Safety Supplies featuring brand names
Fax: (856) 553-6154, PO Box 1003, Blackwood, NJ 08012
--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at
membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post
