DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive
From: Samuella Sigmann <sigmannsb**At_Symbol_Here**appstate.edu>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Subject: [DCHAS-L] Letter to the National PTA regarding the rainbow flamedemo
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:02:02 -0400
Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU>
Message-ID: e3bb0c57-d09e-c137-57b3-8b3ab4869f27**At_Symbol_Here**appstate.edu
In-Reply-To <5d10ad1d.1c69fb81.fb077.0125**At_Symbol_Here**mx.google.com>
On 6/24/2019 6:59 AM, Meg Osterby wrote:
When I did
my teacher education coursework, they stressed that I'd always
need to keep learning more and more chemistry content to keep up
with the science.� Apparently, my daughter and her colleagues are
being taught something very different, and I believe it is a big
part of the problem we are facing.� � My daughter thinks that
teacher education should focus only on pedagogy, and let the
subject area courses teach the content.
This was addressed at the trial.� The defense lawyer wanted to claim
that the school did not need to insure that teachers knew about the
NY Department of Education Science Safety Manual because they could
be expected to know all about that based on their education and
degree. However, for some reason he went on to bring up a quote in
my paper that stating how few teachers were actually educated in
safety.� I said that this is precisely why the school was negligent
in not making sure all their teachers knew the basics of safety
outlined in a pretty good DOE manual. There is no indication that
any training on the lab standard or GHS had ever taken place. The
teacher had access to colleagues who were very experienced and
immediately stated to officials that there were safer ways to do
this in their statements. The teacher did not have to show a lesson
or safety plan to anyone or let anyone know what she was doing that
day. She did not know who the school safety officer was (that is a
whole other story).
This was not an accident. It was a predictable and preventable
outcome of improper handling of the flammable solvent. The stock
containers of the nitrates were also right on the work bench. No
stock bottles of reagents should have been in the work area -
education.� The class started at
9:00 am the first day back
after a 3 week winter break. There was a child burning on the floor
at
9:05 am. Students were barely in the room and seated
(some were still arriving according to depositions and testimony).�
Where was there control of the class? Where was the discussion about
electronic structure? Where was the safety discussion with the
children?� I said there was not even enough time to take roll.
The defense lawyer wanted to make a big deal out of the fact that
the NFPA article which discusses flame jetting shows no evidence
that a hot evaporating dish can be an ignition source. I stayed with
the fact that there was a fire and so there must have been an
ignition source be it a flame, hot dish, or static . The teacher
should not have had casual access to a jug of MeOH in the work area
and should not have tried to restart the demo - education.
The room had 1 exit by the teacher desk which became blocked as
Alonzo was sitting closest to the door. Alonzo was 2 - 3 feet from
the front desk. There was no shield. All of the guidance that could
have prevented or minimized the results of the day was in the DOE
manual which was published in 2008, but the information was not
known and/or not disseminated because Beacon was a prestigious
school and did not need to tell their people about basic safety
information (according to the defense).
You should provide your daughter (and others) with my article. The
hospital photos of Alonzo were entered into evidence over the
objection of the defense lawyer as being "inflammatory".� Imagine
using that word in front of the child and his family. The reporting
said that some of the jurors turned away. I did not turn away when
those photos were emailed to me.
Maybe those who design teacher education curriculum could see fit to
give up a course in bulletin board design for one in safety for
teachers who will be working with chemicals and demonstrations?
Sammye
--
******************************************************************************
We, the willing, led by the
unknowing, are doing the
impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, for
so long, with so
little, we are now qualified to do everything with
nothing. Teresa
Arnold paraphrased from Konstantin Josef Jire�?ek
(1854 �?? 1918)
�
Samuella
B. Sigmann, MS, NRCC-CHO
Chair,
ACS Division of Chemical Health
& Safety,
2019
Senior
Lecturer/Safety Committee Chair/Director of Stockroom
Chemistry
Appalachian
State University
525
Rivers Street
Boone,
NC 28608
Phone:
828 262 2755
Fax:
828 262 6558
Email:
sigmannsb**At_Symbol_Here**appstate.edu
�
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post