From: John Callen <jbcallen**At_Symbol_Here**GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Fwd: [DCHAS-L] [DCHAS-L] COVID-19 Question
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:42:35 -0500
Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU>
Message-ID: 94F89B26-4E4D-4C7B-BCDE-D145E7D7F1F1**At_Symbol_Here**gmail.com


Please send this forwarded eMail below with the link to the 3M Technical Data Bulletin to the DCHAS Members on my behalf. 

It should be quite helpful. 

You may or may not know that I have been a member of the American Chemical Society for over 50 years and a founding member of DCHAS.

Thanks!

John B.Callen, Ph.D.
3M Personal Safety Division - Retired
(312) 632-1095

Begin forwarded message:

Subject: RE: Fwd: [DCHAS-L] COVID-19 Question
Date: March 24, 2020 at 9:39:07 AM CDT

John,

Here is the messaging we've been sending out.
 
We at 3M have been studying ways to sterilize or disinfect disposable N95 respirators for years. There are at least four key aspects of successful disinfection of respirators, and most studies do not take all four into consideration. The disinfection method must be effective against the target organism, such as the virus that causes COVID-19, it must not damage the respirator's filtration, it must not affect the respirator's fit, and it must be safe for the person wearing the respirator (e.g. no off-gassing of chemicals into the breathing zone). If the filtration is damaged or the respirator does not fit it will not help reduce exposure to airborne particles at the level indicated, such as N95.  So far, no disinfection method has met those four essential criteria and without all four the method is not acceptable. 
 
3M is now working with several major sterilization and disinfection companies and consulting with external experts to develop an effective disinfection method. We are hopeful that we will find an effective method soon.  We have had many offers to work with other companies and we appreciate all of the collaboration.  We are going to focus our efforts on a finding a solution as quickly as possible and then expand to working with other companies.
 
Technical Data Bulletin
 
We have not recommended EtO because there is concern that EtO could be held in the respirator and might off-gas into the wearer's breathing zone. 
 
 
=46rom OSHA: "Ethylene oxide (EtO) is produced in large volumes and is primarily used as an intermediate in the production of several industrial chemicals, the most notable of which is ethylene glycol. It is also used as a fumigant in certain agricultural products and as a sterilant for medical equipment and supplies. Unfortunately, EtO possesses several physical and health hazards that merit special attention. EtO is both flammable and highly reactive. Acute exposures to EtO gas may result in respiratory irritation and lung injury, headache, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, shortness of breath, and cyanosis. Chronic exposure has been associated with the occurrence of cancer, reproductive effects, mutagenic changes, neurotoxicity, and sensitization."

Nicole Vars McCullough, PhD, CIH | Global Application Engineering and Regulatory Manager 
Personal Safety Division
3M Center, 235-2E-91 | St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 | United States
Office: +1 651-575-8294 | Mobile: +1 651-260-1372
nvars-mccoullough**At_Symbol_Here**mmm.com

From: John Callen <jbcallen**At_Symbol_Here**gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 8:48 AM
To: Nikki McCullough <nvars-mccoullough**At_Symbol_Here**mmm.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Fwd: [DCHAS-L] COVID-19 Question
 
Hi Nikki!
 
Hope you and your family are safe and well during these trying times.
 
I belong to the American Chemical Society's Division of Chemical Health and Safety (DCHAS).
 
DCHAS has a blog through which the members can ask questions and get responses from one or more members.
 
Similar to the AIHA, members come from the public and private sectors covering academia, industry and consultants and many have safety and industrial hygiene backgrounds.
 
With the Covid-19 Pandemic, the question was raised about reuse (See the string of eMails from the bottom up).
 
I ran across this same situation and questions over 30 years ago when I was in New York as a sales rep during the TB epidemic and working with the New York City Departments of Epidemiology and Health, NY State and Federal OSHA and the CDC.
 
How do we factually tell these people that many of the suggested methods (UV or gamma radiation, steam or EtO gas sterilization and wiping with or immersing in a disinfectant) are not acceptable since they would either alter or degrade the filter media.  I told them that once they do that, the Filtering Facepiece Respirator [FFR]  (e.g., 8710/8715 under 30CFR Part 11 and then the 8210 or 1860 under 42CFR Part 84) or replaceable respirator filter media (e.g., 2091) is no longer a 3M FFR or filter certified by NIOSH. They are not following 3M Instructions for use, reuse and disposal and would definitely constitute a misuse.  The form and fit of the FFR or filter media may possibly be the same but decidedly the function may be altered/changed in terms of efficiency, etc.  
 
Do we have any current data to support these radiation, sterilization or disinfection methods?  
 
The only thing I remember about reuse of a Filtering Facepiece Respirator was back in the early days when we introduced the 3M 9900 Toxic Dust /Mist Respirator in 1978 during the time of the OSHA Lead Health Standard, 29 CFR 1910.1025 (14NOV1978).  The NIOSH Certification under 30 CFR Part 11 for our respirator and several competitors (e.g., AO and Willson at that time) allowed for reuse up to 3 times provided you could effectively lightly vacuum the outside shell of the filtering facepeice respirator.  This practice was a gimmick, at best, not practical and very short lived.  Also, this was before we introduced our Advanced Electret Media.   
 
Please let me know your thoughts.  Thanks!
 
All My Best,
 
 
John


John B.Callen, Ph.D.

3M Personal Safety Division - Retired

(312) 632-0195

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.