From: Jack Reidy <jreidy2**At_Symbol_Here**STANFORD.EDU>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Diversity in Chemical Health and Safety
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 21:04:55 +0000
Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU>
Message-ID: BYAPR02MB568670E4A1B809AD3115148E8C790**At_Symbol_Here**BYAPR02MB5686.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
In-Reply-To


All,

 

I've thought on this for a few hours now, and what I keep coming back to is the importance of listening. As I've tried to educate myself more on diversity and what fosters it or discourages it, a running theme is that people don't want to be where they don't feel welcome. If a person enters a workplace and is met with things that make them uncomfortable, that already is a problem. This is often compounded by the fact that when they try to bring up the problem, they receive push back rather than understanding. Sometimes it's fairly benign, saying "oh I'm sure they didn't mean it like that" or something similar, trying to assume the best of people (at the expense of the feelings of others). Sometimes it's more blunt dismissal, particularly the ever-popular "it was just a joke, can't you take a joke?" Worst of all it may be outright retaliation.

 

For me, learning to suppress that instinct to push back and to instead listen and reflect was hard. I say instinct, because when someone says "you said/did something that hurt me" or "this person you like or admire said/did something that hurt me" or "this system you participate in and benefit from has deep flaws," it's a natural reaction to not want to believe that. Who wants to think they've been part of hurting others? It's a lot easier to think "well I'm sure they misunderstood or overreacted" and that everything is good than to admit that there's a problem. But once I became able to accept that discomfort, process it, and learn from it, I've been able to gain a greater understanding of the problems those who face prejudice experience, and thus what may keep them out of a field.

 

Listening isn't the be-all-end-all of course, but I think it's a necessary first step. To fix a system, you have to understand it. Prejudice isn't going to be solved by random action, the equivalent of banging on the TV and hoping the picture comes through clearer. I think that process will be uncomfortable, sometimes even painful for people like me who have never faced any discrimination, and even for people who may have experienced discrimination in one way but not another (e.g., facing homophobia but not racism). But I think it's necessary if we want to address the problems that make others feel unwelcome.

 

Sincerely,

 

Jack Reidy (he/him)

Research Safety Specialist, Assistant Chemical Hygiene Officer

Environmental Health & Safety

Stanford University

484 Oak Road, Stanford, CA, 94305

Tel: (650) 497-7614

 

From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU> On Behalf Of Frankie Wood-Black
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 8:26 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Diversity in Chemical Health and Safety

 

Good Morning All,

 

We recently had a discussion about this - and it got me to thinking.  We have talked about diversity before and we have even had several symposia over the years focusing on diversity issues, such as how to manage cultural differences in the teaching laboratories, i.e. the appreciation and level of safety of our student populations, dealing with cultural differences with regard to attire, managing reproductive health issues, etc.  

 

But we really have tackled the question about how to increase our diversity in the profession.  My initial thoughts are that we do have an issue about how people enter the profession in the first place.  

 

And, I would like to hear from folks on this topic as it is a great conversation to be having.  

 

I listened this morning to an interview by a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff talking about issues in the military, and he made a profound statement - if you look at the current Joint Chiefs - you see the same demographic, but there is a commonality as to their career paths, and when you look at those career paths, you see that there is a lack of diversity, even though the diversity has increased throughout the military.  (We have historically seen that as well in many career paths.) He indicated that we have to do better recruiting in those career paths that lead to what is seen as successful, i.e. start from the bottom up.  

 

We have historically seen this - and we are seeing change - but it is slow - what can we do to help foster this change?


Frankie Wood-Black, Ph.D., REM, MBA

Principal - Sophic Pursuits

NOTE - ADDRESS CHANGE - Mailing Address - PO Box 433, Tonkawa, OK 74653

 

580-761-3703

--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.