Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive


From: Laurence Doemeny <ldoemeny**At_Symbol_Here**COX.NET>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Issues with face coverings
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 21:28:45 -0700
Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU>
Message-ID: 001b01d68cab$0955c300$1c014900$**At_Symbol_Here**net
In-Reply-To <7C01C7D5-0201-4F0A-953F-77731D643411**At_Symbol_Here**comcast.net>


A search of specific surface areas of some cotton fibers is in the low double digits m2 for a gram of cotton fiber. Activated charcoal is 3000 m2 per gram. Seems like a nonissue.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU] On Behalf Of Kim Jeskie
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 4:56 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Issues with face coverings

 

Just a curiosity question. We have a research group raising concerns that face coverings could inhibit one's ability to smell, a sense they believe they really need to have in a laboratory setting. I've seen publications disputing concerns around carbon dioxide entrapment and heard plenty of practical comments about being able to smell cologne through the coverings, but I haven't seen anything published on this topic. It sounds like a weak argument to me, but I don't want to simply discount this concern without a good faith effort to find out if there's any real evidence that this is a valid concern. Any thoughts/comments that you would care to share?

 

Thanks,

Kim

 

---

For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org

Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post